<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Pain Management Nursing - Articles in Press</title><description>Pain Management Nursing RSS feed: Articles in Press.    This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles 
from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional 
features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.   </description><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2012 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1524-9042</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2012 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000446/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000422/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000409/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000367/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001925/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000355/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000379/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000197/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000173/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000239/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001895/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001445/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001810/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100230X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000185/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001901/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100138X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001391/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001433/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100141X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001809/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100186X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001299/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001937/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001913/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001226/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001421/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001834/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001846/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001858/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001305/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000816/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001408/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001822/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001275/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001287/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001317/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001330/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001135/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001329/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001366/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001378/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100124X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001238/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001123/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001159/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001160/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001147/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000828/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001111/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000446/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Older Adults' Pain Communication During Ambulatory Medical Visits: An Exploration of Communication Accommodation Theory - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000446/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The purpose of this descriptive secondary analysis was to explore the use of Communication Accommodation Theory as a framework to examine pain communication strategies used by older adults and their primary care practitioners during medical ambulatory care visits. Ambulatory medical visits for 22 older adults with moderate or greater osteoarthritis pain were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two independent raters for six a priori communication strategies derived from the attuning strategies of Communication Accommodation Theory: 1) patient selecting the pain topic; 2) patient taking a turn; 3) patient maintaining focus on the pain topic; 4) practitioner using an open-ended question without social desirability to start the pain discussion; 5) practitioner encouraging the patient to take a turn by asking open-ended questions; and 6) practitioner interruptions. The majority of practitioners did not start the pain discussion with an open-ended question, but did not interrupt the older adults as they discussed their pain. Five (22.7%) of the older adults did not discuss their osteoarthritis pain during the ambulatory medical visit. The majority of patients took their turn during the pain discussion, but did not maintain focus while describing important osteoarthritis pain information to their practitioner. Practitioners might assist older adults to communicate more information about their pain by initiating the pain discussion with an open-ended pain question. Older adults might provide more pain information to their practitioner by staying on the pain topic until they have completed all of the pain information they wish to discuss with the practitioner.</description><dc:title>Older Adults' Pain Communication During Ambulatory Medical Visits: An Exploration of Communication Accommodation Theory - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jennifer Hehl, Deborah Dillon McDonald</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.03.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-05-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-05-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000422/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Innovating in Pain Assessment of the Critically Ill: Exploring Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Bedside Approach - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000422/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Nurses play a crucial role in the evaluation and treatment of pain in the critically ill patient. This responsibility is all the more critical with this particular population because many may not be able to self-report their pain level and the typical behavioral signs of pain may be subtle or absent. According to recent recommendations, vital signs should not be used as primary indicators of pain but rather considered as a cue to begin further assessment. Other than vital signs, human brain reactivity to pain has been extensively studied with the use mainly of magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography. However, the use of these sophisticated methods may be unrealistic in the critically ill. Of interest to assessing these patients in a clinical setting is the noninvasive measurement of regional cerebral tissue oxygenation with the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technique. There are indications that NIRS is capable of detecting the cerebral hemodynamic changes associated with sensory stimuli, including pain. The objective of this review paper is to provide nurses with a better understanding of NIRS technology, including a review of the literature on functional studies that have used NIRS in critically ill populations, and how it could be used in both research and practice. Current NIRS techniques have well recognized limitations which must be considered carefully during the measurement and interpretation of signals. Thus, its clinical use is yet to be fully established. Nonetheless, cerebral NIRS technique as an approach to assess brain activity in response to pain should not be abandoned.</description><dc:title>Innovating in Pain Assessment of the Critically Ill: Exploring Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Bedside Approach - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Manon Ranger, Céline Gélinas</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.03.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000409/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nonmedical Methods to Relieve Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Descriptive Study in Northeastern Turkey - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000409/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Low back pain due to the effects of lumbar disc herniation is a common complaint of patients who often subsequently seek help from medical professionals. It is also a significant health problem which is quite difficult to treat. This descriptive study was conducted to determine nonmedical methods used by patients with lumbar disc herniation to relieve low back pain; the patients’ intensity of low back pain when they were admitted to the hospital was also explored. Ninety-two patients with lumbar disc herniation participated in this study, which was carried out at a university hospital in northeastern Turkey. Data were collected using a patient information form and the visual analog scale (VAS). When the patients were admitted to hospital, their mean VAS score was 6.56 ± 2.45. The study results showed that as a first choice nearly all of the patients (94.6%) with lumbar disc herniation preferred consulting with their physicians before to obtain relief for low back pain. However, in addition to seeing their physician, more than one-half of these patients (57.6%) also used nonmedical methods. The primary nonmedical methods were hot/cold compresses, wrapping various substances on the back, and herbal preparations. An increase in pain was noted by 17.0% of patients after using nonmedical methods. Findings indicated that more than two-thirds of patients experienced either no change or an increase in pain after using nonmedical methods to find relief.</description><dc:title>Nonmedical Methods to Relieve Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Descriptive Study in Northeastern Turkey - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Dilek Cilingir, Sevilay Hintistan, Cagla Yigitbas, Nesrin Nural</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.03.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000367/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Management of Pediatric Nurses in Turkey - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000367/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Nurses play an important role in managing children’s pain. The nurse’s accurate assessment, appropriate intervention, and evaluation of pain relief measures are necessary for positive patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes of pediatric nurses regarding the child’s pain. The Pediatric Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude Survey (PNKAS) was used to evaluate the nurses’ knowledge and attitudes. The PNKAS consists of 40 questions. In this study, 29.9% of nurses had a diploma and 40.6% associate’s, 25.0% bachelor’s, and 4.5% master’s degree, and respondents had an everage 6.1 years pediatric nursing experience. The total mean score on the PNKAS scale was 38.2%. The highest score was 65%, and the lowest score 15%. The findings of the survey show that pediatric nurses in Turkey have insufficient knowledge regarding pain management and could benefit from additional education on that issue.</description><dc:title>Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Management of Pediatric Nurses in Turkey - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ayfer Ekim, Ayse Ferda Ocakcı</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.02.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001925/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Health-Related Profile and Quality of Life Among Nursing Home Residents: Does Pain Matter? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001925/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The purpose of this exploratory cross-sectional study was to explore the health-related profile and quality of life among older persons living with and without pain in nursing homes. Ten nursing homes were approached, and 535 older persons were invited to join the study from 2009 to 2011. The nursing home residents’ demographic information and information regarding their pain situation and the use of oral analgesic drug and nondrug therapy among the older residents with chronic pain were also collected. Residents’ physical health (using the Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Elderly Mobility Scores); psychologic health, including happiness, life satisfaction, depression, and loneliness (using the Happiness Scale, the Life Satisfaction Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the UCLA Loneliness Scale); and quality of life were investigated. Among the 535 nursing home residents, 396 (74%) of them suffered from pain, with mean pain scores of 4.09 ± 2.19, indicating medium pain intensity a remaining 139 (26%) reported no pain. The location of pain was mainly in the knees, back and shoulders. Our results demonstrated that, with the exception of the no-pain group (p &lt; .05), nursing home residents’ pain affected both their psychologic health, including happiness, life satisfaction, and depression, and their physical quality of life. Nevertheless, only one-half of the older persons with pain used oral analgesic drug or nondrug therapy to relieve their pain. Pain had a significant impact on their mobility and ADL, was positively correlated with happiness and life satisfaction, and was negatively correlated with loneliness and depression. Pain management is a high priority in elderly care; as such, innovative and interdisciplinary strategies are necessary to enhance quality of life particularly for older persons living in nursing homes.</description><dc:title>Health-Related Profile and Quality of Life Among Nursing Home Residents: Does Pain Matter? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Mimi M.Y. Tse, Vanessa T.C. Wan, Sinfia K.S. Vong</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000355/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Feasibility and Clinical Utility of the Japanese Version of the Abbey Pain Scale in Japanese Aged Care - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000355/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Active usage of observational pain scales in Japanese aged-care facilities has not been previously described. Therefore, to examine the feasibility and clinical utility of the Abbey Pain Scale–Japanese version (APS-J), this study examined the interrater reliability of the APS-J among a researcher, nurses, and care workers in aged-care facilities in Japan. This study also aimed to obtain nurses’ and care workers’ opinions on use of the scale. The following data were collected from 88 residents of two aged-care facilities: demographics, Barthel Index, Folstein Mini-Mental Examination (MMSE), 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), and APS-J for pain. The researchers, nurses, and care workers independently assessed the residents’ pain by using the APS-J, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for interrater reliability and Cronbach alpha for internal consistency were examined. The ICC between researchers and nurses, researchers and care workers, and nurses and care workers were 0.68, 0.74, and 0.76, respectively. Nurses and care workers were invited for focus group interviews to obtain their opinions regarding APS-J use. During these interviews, nurses and care workers stated that the observational points of APS-J subscales were the criteria they normally used to evaluate residents’ pain. Several nurses and care workers reported a gap between the estimated pain intensity and APS-J score. Unclear APS-J criteria, difficulties in observing residents, and insufficient practice guidelines were also reported. Our findings indicate that the APS-J has moderate reliability and clinically utility. To facilitate APS-J usage, education and clinical guidelines for pain management may be required for nurses and care workers.</description><dc:title>Feasibility and Clinical Utility of the Japanese Version of the Abbey Pain Scale in Japanese Aged Care - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Yukari Takai, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani, Yumi Chiba, Ayako Kato</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.02.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000379/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Description of Behaviors in Nonverbal Critically Ill Patients With a Traumatic Brain Injury When Exposed to Common Procedures in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000379/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Behavioral indicators are strongly recommended for pain assessment in nonverbal patients. Although pain-related behaviors have been studied in critically ill patients, those with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been either excluded or underrepresented. Because these patients also likely experience pain, research is urgently needed to generate knowledge in this field. This pilot study aimed to explore pain-related behaviors of critically ill TBI patients when exposed to common procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU), using video recording at the bedside and a newly developed coding system. Ten TBI patients hospitalized in the ICU participated. A 44-item behavioral checklist created from existing tools was used as a coding system to identify behaviors before, during, and 20 minutes after a nociceptive procedure (turning) and a nonnociceptive procedure (noninvasive blood pressure [NIBP]). Patients were video recorded to check for interrater agreement between two trained observers. TBI patients exhibited more behaviors during turning than at rest or during NIBP (p &lt; .001). The following behaviors were observed during turning: levator contraction (n = 7), frowning (n = 5), opening eyes (n = 5), weeping eyes (n = 5), raising eyebrows (n = 5), activating the ventilator alarms (n = 7), and muscle tension (n = 5). No change in behaviors was noted during NIBP. After educational training and using videos, the average percentage of agreement for observed behaviors between two trained research assistants was 96%. Pain in critically ill TBI patients can be detrimental to health and recovery. ICU clinicians should be aware of pain-related behaviors to enable better detection and treatment in this highly vulnerable group.</description><dc:title>Description of Behaviors in Nonverbal Critically Ill Patients With a Traumatic Brain Injury When Exposed to Common Procedures in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Quynh Le, Céline Gélinas, Caroline Arbour, Nathalie Rodrigue</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.02.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-04-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000197/abstract?rss=yes"><title>How Well Is Acute Pain in Children Managed? A Snapshot in One English Hospital - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000197/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This study set out to obtain a picture of pediatric pain management practices in one English hospital. Data were collected on two wards. Nonparticipant observation combined with a chart audit was used to collect data about actual practices. Questionnaires were used to collect information from parents and young people. Observational data showed that practices conformed to current guidelines in some but not all areas. When prescribed, the dosage of analgesic drugs complied with the hospital's guidelines, and drugs were usually administered as prescribed. There was some involvement of parents in decision making but this was usually initiated by them rather than the nurses. Pain assessment tools were not always used nor was a pain history routinely taken. Documentation about pain management was limited and there was little evidence of nonpharmacologic methods of pain relief being used. Parents and young people felt that their pain management was of an acceptable level or very good. This was despite the fact that 58% of children experienced severe pain and 24% moderate pain. The results provide a snapshot of pain management in one English hospital. As in other studies, pain management practices do not adhere to current guidelines in all areas, and children appear to be experiencing moderate to severe pain. Despite this, parents and children indicated that they were happy with the quality of pain management. There is a need to explore this further and to identify strategies that support the implementation of guidelines in practice.</description><dc:title>How Well Is Acute Pain in Children Managed? A Snapshot in One English Hospital - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Alison Twycross, Sue Collis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.01.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-29</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-29</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000173/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Complementary Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Are They Effective? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000173/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Increasing interest has focused on complementary management modalities, including tai chi, acupuncture, yoga, and massage therapy, as treatments for osteoarthritis (OA). This review article synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) that examined one or more of the above as treatments for OA. Medline, Pubmed, and Cinahl databases were searched to identify English-language articles using an RCT design or that conducted a SR of published studies and presented data on symptom or functional outcomes. Two authors independently abstracted relevant information (e.g., study sample, intervention characteristics, treatment effects, safety data). Retained articles (n = 29) included those that evaluated tai chi (8 RCTs, 2 SRs), acupuncture (11 RCTs, 4 SRs), yoga (2 RCTs), and massage therapy (2 RCTs). Available evidence indicates that tai chi, acupuncture, yoga, and massage therapy are safe for use by individuals with OA. Positive short-term (≤6 months) effects in the form of reduced pain and improved self-reported physical functioning were found for all 4 treatments. Limited information exists regarding the relative effectiveness of the therapies (e.g., yoga vs. tai chi vs. acupuncture), as well as treatment effects in persons with joint involvement besides the knee and in distinct patient subgroups (e.g., older vs. younger adults, persons with mild vs. moderate vs. advanced disease). Complementary therapies can reduce pain and improve function in adults with OA. Research is needed to evaluate long-term benefits of the treatments, as well as their relative effects among diverse patient subgroups.</description><dc:title>Complementary Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Are They Effective? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Rouzi Shengelia, Samantha J. Parker, Mary Ballin, Teena George, M. Carrington Reid</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.01.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000239/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain Management Among Nursing Faculty - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000239/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A descriptive correlational design was used in this study to examine nursing faculty knowledge and attitudes in pain management. Relationships between age, education level, pain management preparation, length of time practicing as a nurse, length of time teaching nursing, time teaching pain management in the classroom, taught pain guidelines in the classroom, and additional continuing education about pain management were explored. Ninety-six nursing faculty participated from 16 schools of nursing in one Midwestern U.S. region. Findings identified that most of the nursing faculty recalled being taught about pain management in their basic education, but less than one-half felt adequately prepared. Most respondents said that they taught pain management, yet fewer than one-half identified that they used specific pain management guidelines. Faculty demonstrated adequate knowledge of pain assessment, spiritual/cultural issues, and pathophysiology. Areas of weakness were found in medications, interventions, and addiction. Faculty that reported teaching pain management in the classroom and reported more continuing education missed fewer items. Older nursing faculty reported more years of practice, more years of teaching, and more continuing education in pain management than younger faculty. Younger nursing faculty remembered being taught pain management in nursing school and felt more adequately prepared than older nursing faculty. Faculty that reported practicing for longer periods of time felt less prepared in pain management than faculty who practiced for shorter periods of time. More continuing education in pain management may be needed for older nurses to meet the recommendations of the Institute of Medicines' report on relieving pain in the U.S.</description><dc:title>Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain Management Among Nursing Faculty - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Barbara Voshall, Karen S. Dunn, Debra Shelestak</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.02.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001895/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Effect of a Familiar Scent on the Behavioral and Physiological Pain Responses in Neonates - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001895/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: There are adverse physiologic effects of pain in neonates, and effective pain management must be an essential aspect of neonatal care. In this study we assessed the effect of a nonmaternal familiar scent on the neonatal pain responses. This study included 135 neonates randomly assigned to one of three groups. During arterial puncture, one group was exposed to a vanillin scent on a gauze pad held next to their nose. They were familiarized with it the night before blood sampling by a scented gauze pad placed in the incubator next to their head for an average duration of 8.65 hours. The second group was not familiarized with the scent but was exposed to it during the procedure. The third group was neither familiarized nor exposed to the scent. The duration of crying in the familiar scent group was significantly lower than in the two other groups. Comparison of the physiologic parameters showed less variation in oxygen saturation level during arterial puncture in the familiar scent group. In this study, a familiar scent could reduce crying and oxygen consumption during arterial puncture.</description><dc:title>The Effect of a Familiar Scent on the Behavioral and Physiological Pain Responses in Neonates - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Akram Sadat Sadathosseini, Reza Negarandeh, Zeinab Movahedi</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001445/abstract?rss=yes"><title>American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) Position Statement: Male Infant Circumcision Pain Management - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001445/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) holds the position that nurses and other health care professionals must provide optimal pain management throughout the circumcision process for male infants. Parents must be prepared for the procedure and educated about infant pain assessment. They must also be informed of pharmacologic and integrative pain management therapies.</description><dc:title>American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) Position Statement: Male Infant Circumcision Pain Management - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Susan O’Conner-Von, Helen N. Turner</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001810/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Self-Efficacy, Pain-Related Fear, and Disability in a Heterogeneous Pain Sample - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001810/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The fear avoidance model of chronic pain is well established for specific chronic pain groups and of considerable clinical utility, but it suffers from poor generalizability. Therefore, in this study we examined the role of self-efficacy (SE) in the relationship between pain-related fear (PRF) and three pain-related outcomes—pain severity, disability, and depression—in a more heterogeneous chronic pain sample. Sixty-eight participants between the ages of 18 and 75 years experiencing chronic pain were recruited from the general public. Participants completed a questionnaire that measured catastrophizing, SE, fear of movement, avoidance behavior, PRF, pain severity, disability, and depression. In support of our first hypotheses, higher SE was associated with: 1) less catastrophizing, fear of movement, avoidance of pain, and PRF; and 2) less pain severity, disability, and depression. And higher catastrophizing, fear of movement, avoidance of pain, and PRF were associated with higher pain severity, disability, and depression. Although complete mediation was not found, post hoc examination of partial correlations revealed that the relationship between PRF and disability was partially mediated by SE; however, SE had no mediatory effect on the relationship between PRF and either pain severity or depression. Within the constraints of a relatively small sample size, we concluded that within a heterogeneous pain population, PRF remains the most integral component of the fear avoidance model.</description><dc:title>Self-Efficacy, Pain-Related Fear, and Disability in a Heterogeneous Pain Sample - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Elle V. Perry, Andrew J.P. Francis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100230X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Chronic Pain: An Integrated Biobehavioral Approach - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100230X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Chronic Pain: An Integrated Biobehavioral Approach by Herta Flor and Dennis Turk provides health care professionals from all disciplines an understanding of an integrated biobehavioral approach to the treatment of patients with chronic pain. The reader is introduced to biobehavioral concepts and constructs and how these can be applied to chronic pain assessment and treatment modalities. Nurses play a key role in providing seamless care to patients with chronic pain, and this book is an excellent resource for coordinating a biobehavioral approach into practice.</description><dc:title>Chronic Pain: An Integrated Biobehavioral Approach - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Cecile B. Evans</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.11.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000185/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Validity and Reliability of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool: A Replication Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904212000185/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Critically ill patients are often not able to self-report the presence of pain. Currently there is no generally accepted assessment tool for this population. The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) was developed for pain assessment of critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to replicate the findings of the Gelinas et al. (2006) CPOT reference study and examine the interrater reliability (IRR), discriminant validity (DV), and criterion validity (CV) of the CPOT. This quantitative study used a repeated measures design with a convenience sample of 21 postoperative open heart surgery patients cared for in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Testing for IRR in this sample showed a range of results resulting in fair to almost perfect IRR; the findings of this study suggest that the instrument’s IRR is acceptable but variable. Testing for DV demonstrated a significant difference in mean scores between noxious (painful) and nonnoxious (nonpainful) procedures. Testing for CV showed a weak nonsignificant Spearman correlation of 0.26 (P &lt; .312) between CPOT scores and patient self-report during repositioning after extubation. This replication study adds to four studies that have examined psychometric attributes of the instrument and contributes to the process of translating the use of this instrument to the clinical setting.</description><dc:title>Validity and Reliability of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool: A Replication Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kathleen Marie Keane</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2012.01.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001901/abstract?rss=yes"><title>An Ethnography of Chronic Pain in Veteran Enlisted Women - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001901/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Enlisted women are an essential subpopulation within the United States (U.S.) Armed Services, yet little is known about their chronic pain experiences. The purpose of this study was to describe veteran enlisted women's chronic pain experiences, both while on active duty and since active duty ended. A total of 15 enlisted women were interviewed. This ethnographic approach produced stories of their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors regarding their chronic pain and the care they have received both while serving and after discharge or retirement. The findings show that U.S. military culture and training have a major impact on enlisted women's chronic pain experiences. Enlisted women learn to ignore or deny acute pain because it would hamper their ability to complete their military mission. Even when they admit to themselves that they are in pain, they may mask the pain from others for fear of being called weak or fear of discrimination and ostracism. When the pain can no longer be ignored and they seek health care, they are frustrated when their pain reports are not believed by supervisors and health care providers. Chronic pain eventually leads to discharge or retirement when they can no longer do their job. Health care providers must understand both U.S. military culture and enlisted women's strategies concerning pain if they are to accurately diagnose and sufficiently treat enlisted women in pain.</description><dc:title>An Ethnography of Chronic Pain in Veteran Enlisted Women - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Linda Denke, Donelle M. Barnes</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100138X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Bridging the Gap Between Mind and Body: A Biobehavioral Model of the Effects of Guided Imagery on Pain, Pain Disability, and Depression - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100138X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is a common and complex disorder associated with declines in physical health and functional status, emotional well-being, and quality of life. To best address the complexity of this condition, research and clinical practice for CNCP should be guided by a framework incorporating both biologic and psychologic factors. This article presents a biobehavioral model of chronic pain that hypothesizes mechanisms related to the effectiveness of a complementary therapy, guided imagery (GI), for this population. Using the research-to-model/theory strategy, we mapped findings from published reports of interdisciplinary research into physiologic and psychologic aspects of the nature and mechanisms of pain, as well as the use of GI for pain, to build the model of GI's effects on pain, pain disability, and depression. In the model, these outcomes of GI for persons experiencing CNCP are mediated by psychologic (pain self-efficacy and pain beliefs) and physiologic (immune-mediated analgesia and sickness response) variables. A biobehavioral approach to nursing phenomena will advance understanding of health and health-related issues and has the potential to improve outcomes through delineation of mechanisms underlying relationships between psychologic and biologic factors. Increased consumer use of complementary therapies to treat pain, the current cost-driven health care system, and the mandate for evidence-based practice support the need to validate the efficacy of such therapies. This empirically derived model provides a framework for practice and research for nurses and other health care providers to promote health, function, and well-being in persons with CNCP.</description><dc:title>Bridging the Gap Between Mind and Body: A Biobehavioral Model of the Effects of Guided Imagery on Pain, Pain Disability, and Depression - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Wendy Lewandowski, Ann Jacobson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-16</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001391/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Use of Oral Sucrose for Procedural Pain Relief in Infants Up to Six Months of Age: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001391/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral sucrose in decreasing pain during minor procedures in infants of 1-6 months corrected age. A blinded randomized controlled trial with infants aged 4-26 weeks who underwent venipuncture, heel lance or intravenous cannulation were stratified by corrected age into &gt;4-12 weeks and &gt;12-26 weeks. They received 2 mL of either 25% sucrose or sterile water orally 2 minutes before the painful procedure. Nonnutritional sucking and parental comfort, provided in adherence to hospital guidelines, were recorded. Pain behavior was recorded using a validated 10 point scale at baseline, during and following the procedure. Data collectors were blinded to the intervention. A total of 21 and 20 infants received sucrose and water, respectively, in the &gt;4–12-week age group, and 21 and 22, respectively, in the &gt;12–26-week age group. No statistical differences were found in pain scores between treatment and control groups at any data collection points in either age group. Infants aged &gt;4-12 weeks who did nonnutritional sucking showed statistically significantly lower median pain scores at 1, 2, and 3 minutes after the procedure than those who did not suck. Infants aged &gt;4-26 weeks exhibited pain behavior scores that indicated moderate to large pain during painful procedures; however, there was insufficient evidence to show that 2 mL 25% sucrose had a statistically significant effect in decreasing pain. Infants should be offered nonnutritional sucking in compliance with the Baby Friendly Health Initiative during painful procedures.</description><dc:title>The Use of Oral Sucrose for Procedural Pain Relief in Infants Up to Six Months of Age: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sally Wilson, Alexandra P. Bremner, Judy Mathews, Diane Pearson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001433/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Comparison Between Behavioral and Verbal Report Pain Assessment Tools for Use with Residents in Long Term Care - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001433/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to evaluate four pain assessment tools for use with long-term care (LTC) residents who were both able and not able to verbally report their pain; and 2) to assess whether pain behaviors displayed by LTC residents vary as a function of ability to self-report pain. We examined the differences between these two groups of residents in terms of specific pain behaviors assessed through the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in the Communicatively Impaired (PACI). We also examined the interrater reliability, and concurrent and construct validity of these two behavioral observation tools and the concurrent and construct validity of the two verbal report tools. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 338 residents from six LTC homes. The interrater reliabilities for the two behavioral observation tools were good, and concurrent validity was supported for all four pain assessment tools. Pain behaviors, as assessed by the PACSLAC and PACI, varied as a function of resident ability to verbally report pain. Residents with inability to self-report pain are more nonverbally responsive, although certain behaviors (such as guarding and touching the affected area) are seen more frequently in those capable of self-report. Our data also provide psychometric support for the assessment methods used in this study.</description><dc:title>A Comparison Between Behavioral and Verbal Report Pain Assessment Tools for Use with Residents in Long Term Care - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sharon Kaasalainen, Noori Akhtar-Danesh, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Sandra Zwakhalen, Rene Verreault</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100141X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Concerns About Pain and Prescribed Opioids in Taiwanese Oncology Outpatients - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100141X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pharmacologic agents are considered to be a cornerstone of cancer pain management. Patients' concerns about use of analgesics are likely to lead to poor pain management. The purpose of this study was to describe participants' responses to their beliefs regarding pain and prescribed opioids. Ninety-two outpatients age ≥18 years who had taken prescribed opioid analgesics for cancer-related pain in two teaching hospitals in the Taipei area completed the Pain Opioid Analgesics Beliefs Scale–Cancer. An important finding of this study is that large numbers of patients had misconceptions about using opioids for pain. Between 33.7% and 68.5% of the patients in this study held negative beliefs about opioids and beliefs about pain. Specifically, 68.5% of the patients agreed that “opioid medication is not good for a person's body.” Many patients (62%) agreed that “the more opioid medicine a patient used, the greater the possibility that he/she might rely on the medicine forever,” and 61.0% agreed that “if a patient starts to use opioid medicine at too early a stage, the medicine will have less of an effect later.” Two-thirds (66.3%) of the sample agreed that adult patients should not use opioid medicine frequently. The findings provide empirical support for the need for better programmatic efforts to improve beliefs of pain and analgesics in Taiwanese oncology outpatients.</description><dc:title>Concerns About Pain and Prescribed Opioids in Taiwanese Oncology Outpatients - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Shu-Yuan Liang, Heng-Hsin Tung, Shu-Fang Wu, Shiow-Luan Tsay, Tsae-Jyy Wang, Kang-Pan Chen, Yu-Yin Lu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001809/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Qualitative Evaluation of a Pain Intensity Screen for Children with Severe Neurodevelopmental Disabilities - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001809/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The population of individuals with severe and profound intellectual disabilities (ID) is extremely heterogeneous, and the unique pain-related behaviors of each individual might not be satisfactorily captured using a standardized checklist such as the Noncommunicating Children's Pain Checklist or the Revised Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry, and Consolability tools. There has been increasing appreciation of the importance of recognizing the idiosyncratic pain behaviors of these individuals. The investigators developed a tool, the Tailored Observational Pain Screen (TOPS), to facilitate recognition of pain in the individual who lacks verbal communication, based on caregivers' descriptions of the individual's unique pain-related behaviors. The aim of this study was to elicit caregivers' evaluations of this personalized pain screen, using qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. The participants were the primary caregivers of 13 children with severe or profound ID and ongoing pain issues who were interviewed after they had used the TOPS for 6 weeks. The investigators identified themes from the interviews, including: using the TOPS to recognize and evaluate pain; using the TOPS to facilitate communication; limitations of the TOPS; and recommendations for its improvement. For clinical purposes, the TOPS shows promise as a tool for helping caregivers to share with others the ways that pain of these children can be detected.</description><dc:title>Qualitative Evaluation of a Pain Intensity Screen for Children with Severe Neurodevelopmental Disabilities - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Joan Parker, John L. Belew</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100186X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Is It Related to Vitamin D Deficiency in Premenopausal Female Patients? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100186X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: There are a number of studies that have evaluated the relationship between fibromyalgia (FM) and vitamin D deficiency with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess vitamin D deficiency in patients with FM and to evaluate the relationship with the common symptoms of FM and levels of serum vitamin D. Forty premenopausal female fibromyalgia patients and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of all subjects, including age, sex, and body mass index, were recorded. The number of tender points was recorded, and the intensity of the widespread pain of the subjects was measured by the visual analog scale. The activities of daily living component of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-ADL), was used to assess physical functional capacity. Serum vitamin D was measured in both groups, and vitamin D levels &lt;37.5 nmol/L were accepted as vitamin D deficiency. The vitamin D levels and clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patient and control groups were comparatively analyzed. The relationship between vitamin D levels and clinical findings of the FM patients were also determined. The mean age was 41.23 ± 4.8 and 39.48 ± 4.08 years for the patient and control groups, respectively. The pain intensity, number of tender points, and FIQ-ADL scores were higher in FM patients than in control subjects. The mean levels of vitamin D in the patient and control groups were determined to be 31.97 ± 15.50 and 28.97 ± 13.31 nmol/L, respectively (p &gt; .05). The incidence of vitamin D deficiency was similar between the patient and control groups (67.5% vs. 70%). Vitamin D levels significantly correlated with pain intensity (r = −0.653; p = .001) and FIQ-ADL scores in the FM group (r = −0.344; p = .030). In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that deficiency of vitamin D is not more common in premenopausal female patients with FM than in control subjects without FM. However, the association between pain and vitamin D levels in FM patients emphasizes that hypovitaminosis of vitamin D in the FM syndrome may have an augmenting impact on pain intensity and functional status. Future studies are needed to show the effect of vitamin D supplementation in the reduction of pain intensity and disability in patients suffering from this chronic condition.</description><dc:title>Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Is It Related to Vitamin D Deficiency in Premenopausal Female Patients? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Muyesser Okumus, Mine Koybası, Figen Tuncay, Esma Ceceli, Figen Ayhan, Rezan Yorgancioglu, Pinar Borman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001299/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model of Chronic Pain in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001299/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) is a complex multidimensional experience that includes biologic, psychologic, sociologic, and spiritual factors. To date, three models of pain associated with SCD (i.e., biomedical model, biopsychosocial model for SCD pain, and Health Beliefs Model) have been published. The biopsychosocial multidimensional approach to chronic pain developed by Turk and Gatchel is a widely used model of chronic pain. However, this model has not been applied to chronic pain associated with SCD. In addition, a spiritual/religious dimension is not included in this model. Because spirituality/religion is central to persons affected by SCD, that dimension needs to be added to any model of chronic pain in adults with SCD. In fact, data from one study suggest that spirituality/religiosity is associated with decreased pain intensity in adults with chronic pain from SCD. A biopsychosocial-spiritual model is proposed for adults with chronic pain from SCD, because it embraces the whole person. This model includes the biologic, psychologic, sociologic, and spiritual factors relevant to adults with SCD based on past and current research. The purpose of this paper is to describe an adaptation of Turk and Gatchel’s model of chronic pain for adults with SCD and to summarize research findings that support each component of the revised model (i.e., biologic, psychologic, sociologic, spiritual). The paper concludes with a discussion of implications for the use of this model in research.</description><dc:title>A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model of Chronic Pain in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Lou Ella V. Taylor, Nancy A. Stotts, Janice Humphreys, Marsha J. Treadwell, Christine Miaskowski</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001937/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nurses' Views About the Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Management of Pediatric Pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001937/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Children continue to experience moderate to severe pain during hospitalization. This paper presents data from two modified focus groups undertaken as part of a larger study exploring pediatric pain management practices in one hospital in the south of England. Thirty nurses took part in the focus groups and were asked questions about their views about the barriers and facilitators to effective pain management in the hospital. Participants identified a number of barriers which related to the staff, children and parents and the organization. Nurses indicated that they and the medical staff lacked knowledge about pain management. They also felt that staff shortages and a heavy workload detracted from the quality of the care they could provide. Several participants indicated that insufficient analgesic drugs were sometimes prescribed. Many of the barriers identified related to parents and children. It appears that nurses may not take as active a role as they could do in managing pediatric pain rather seeing it as the parents and child’s responsibility to let them know when they are experiencing pain. Nurses also felt that parents exaggerate their child’s pain and ask for analgesic drugs before their child needs them. There is a need to explore the interactions between nurses, children and parents in this context in more detail.</description><dc:title>Nurses' Views About the Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Management of Pediatric Pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Alison Twycross</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001913/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Managing Pain with Algorithms: An Opportunity for Improvement? Or: The Development and Utilization of Algorithms to Manage Acute Pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001913/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pain management in a hospital setting remains a challenge today. Many health care providers remain anxious and uninformed regarding analgesic titration within a hospital setting. Overcoming the potential risks to obtain the benefits of opiate titration is a challenge within any health care setting. Virginia Commonwealth University, a tertiary medical center which houses schools of medicine, nursing, and pharmacy, evaluated the use of algorithms for managing acute pain. This article describes the Pain Committee's efforts and offers one potential intervention for safe analgesic opioid titration, an algorithm for acute pain management.</description><dc:title>Managing Pain with Algorithms: An Opportunity for Improvement? Or: The Development and Utilization of Algorithms to Manage Acute Pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Patrick Coyne, Laurie Lyckholm, Barton Bobb, Donna Blaney-Brouse, Sarah Harrington, Leanne Yanni</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-12-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-12-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001226/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Administering Ziconotide and Monitoring Patients Treated with Ziconotide: Expert Opinions - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001226/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Some patients with chronic pain who are intolerant of or refractory to treatment with systemic analgesics may benefit from intrathecal therapy. Ziconotide is the first nonopioid analgesic approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for intrathecal administration. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ziconotide. However, the maximum recommended dosing and titration schedule provided in the prescribing information may be too aggressive for some patients, and experience has demonstrated that ziconotide is better tolerated with slower titration to a lower maximum dose. Efficacy can be assessed by an evaluation of changes in pain, functionality, and quality of life. Cognitive adverse events may be subtle; therefore, it is important that health care professionals not only monitor patients for signs and symptoms of cognitive adverse events, but also teach family members how to do the same. Careful patient assessment and monitoring can help optimize the potential benefit from treatment with ziconotide.</description><dc:title>Administering Ziconotide and Monitoring Patients Treated with Ziconotide: Expert Opinions - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Alisia A. Mitchell, Anne J. Sapienza-Crawford, Kari L. Hanley, Kristi J. Lokey, Linda Wells, Gladstone C. McDowell, Michael Stanton-Hicks</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-30</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-30</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001421/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Self-Treatment of Pain Among Adolescents in an Urban Community - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001421/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pain occurrence among adolescents, whether acute or chronic, persistent or intermittent, remains high, with potentially serious effects on quality of life, physical and emotional functioning, and psychosocial adjustment. The prevalence of pain in adolescents varies widely, and although discussed in the literature for more than two decades, data on adolescent knowledge and pain self-treatment is scarce. This descriptive-correlational study identified pain prevalence and intensity and pain self-treatment choices among adolescents in a diverse urban community. Almost 90% (n = 253) of high school students reported pain in the preceding 2 weeks and completed a series of study questionnaires (demographic data form, Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, Adolescent Self-Treatment Survey). Respondents ranged in age from 14 to 19 years (mean 16) and were predominantly female (70%) and caucasian (75%). The sample was representative of all high school grades, and the majority (86%) reported participation in sports, dance, and physical activities. Mean pain scores ranged from 3.0 (current pain) to 6.5 (worst pain), with significantly higher scores among girls. A gender-related effect was also noted for pain interference in activities, mood, and sleep among the adolescent girls compared with the boys. Gender also predicted use of self-treatment methods, with girls more likely to use over-the-counter medications and nonpharmacologic therapies. Number of pain sites was also a strong predictor of use of self-treatment methods among adolescents. Knowledge of the pain experience during adolescence will help guide community-based nursing initiatives aimed at increasing awareness, promoting knowledge about pain and its treatment, and ensuring safety and positive outcomes related to self-treatment.</description><dc:title>Self-Treatment of Pain Among Adolescents in an Urban Community - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Judith M. Fouladbakhsh, April H. Vallerand, Elisabeth S. Jenuwine</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-24</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001834/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Music Provided Through a Portable Media Player (iPod) Blunts Pain During Physical Therapy - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001834/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This research studied, 25 adult patients who underwent physical therapy to assess the analgesic effect of distraction with the use of music during physical therapy. Patients randomly underwent physical therapy once with music provided by an iPod and once without music. In both sessions patients underwent identical physical procedures. At end of both sessions patients filled in 5-item questionnaire where they scored pain and other parameters, such as stress, enjoyment, interaction, and satisfaction, on 10-cm visual analog scale. The mean scores (range, 0-10) of the two sessions were statistically compared. Mean pain scores were significantly lower (p = .031) during the session in which patients received music (4.8 ± 2.5) than during the session without music (5.8 ± 2.3). The other items of the questionnaire did not disclose any statistically significant difference when the sessions with versus without music were compared. Enjoyment (8.5 ± 1.6), interaction (8.3 ± 1.9), and satisfaction (8.6 ± 1.7) scores with music did not significantly differ in the sessions without music (8.5 ± 2.1, 8.5 ± 1.9, and, 8.5 ± 1.5, respectively); mean stress score was, 3.9 in both sessions. The conclusion of the study is that music provided through a portable media player has an analgesic effect. This can be an effective analgesic strategy during painful physical therapy.</description><dc:title>Music Provided Through a Portable Media Player (iPod) Blunts Pain During Physical Therapy - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Carlo Valerio Bellieni, David Cioncoloni, Sandra Mazzanti, Maria Elena Bianchi, Ilenia Morrone, Rossana Becattelli, Serafina Perrone, Giuseppe Buonocore</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001846/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Training the Trainer: An Educational Course for Training Pain Nursing Specialists Supported by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001846/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: To train pain nursing specialists through a pain education program, 20 nurses from six hospitals in Shanghai Province and seven in six provinces of China received the training of 2-month pain education and 4-month clinical practice. This nonrandomized pilot study examined the results of tests before and after the program, case report evaluations, future plan evaluations, clinical practice, and satisfaction questionnaire. After the program, the score of the test increased significantly compared with that before the program (44.1 ± 3.19; paired-sample t = 10.363; p &lt; .0001). All of the participants thought that the program had broadened their vision, 19 (95%) thought that the program had raised the level of their theoretical knowledge in pain management, 17 (85%) thought that the program had improved their skills in clinical practice, and 15 (75%) thought that the program had played a role in enhancing their research abilities. Considering the whole program, most students (n = 17; 85%) were quite satisfied, and 3 (15%) were simply satisfied. By content analysis of the opening questions, we found that the participants had deeper and broader ideas about nurses' role and pain nursing specialists' responsibilities in pain management. The program improved nurses' attitudes, knowledge, and skills in pain management. The participants recognized pain nursing specialists' responsibilities in pain management more clearly.</description><dc:title>Training the Trainer: An Educational Course for Training Pain Nursing Specialists Supported by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jing Cui, Lingjun Zhou, Lingjuan Zhang, Li Li, Jijun Zhao</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001858/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Management of the Hospitalized Patient Experiencing Acute on Chronic Pain: A Case Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001858/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The ability to balance the patient's level of comfort while minimizing adverse outcomes related to overdosing remains the key to providing excellent post operative care for the patient with chronic pain. This article presents the case of a hospitalized patient with severe pain and the challenges her care presented to the nursing staff.</description><dc:title>Management of the Hospitalized Patient Experiencing Acute on Chronic Pain: A Case Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Margaret Costello, Hallie Greenberg, Caprie Bell, Jennefer Trowers-Smith</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001305/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Integrating the Concept of Pain Interference into Pain Management - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001305/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Undertreatment of pain is a significant problem. Nursing pain assessments have been identified as an area for improvement. This concept analysis sought to examine the use of pain interference as a measurement to assist pain management practices. Existing literature including the term pain interference was reviewed for the years 2000-2010. Pain interference is a common outcome measurement in clinical research. It is not well differentiated from other pain concepts in routine nursing pain assessments, nor consistently defined in research articles. Pain interference has been linked to quality of pain management and recommended as a standard of pain measurement. It aligns with current and emerging theories in pain and symptom control. Further exploration is needed to determine whether integrating this concept into nursing practice will result in improved patient pain experiences.</description><dc:title>Integrating the Concept of Pain Interference into Pain Management - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Marian Wilson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000816/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Information-Seeking Coping Behaviors During Painful Procedures in African-American Children with Sickle Cell Disease - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000816/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This study examined the frequency of information-seeking coping behaviors in 37 African-American children (ages 5-17 years) with sickle cell disease during venipuncture. The relationships between coping behaviors and child- and parent-reported pain and observational distress were also assessed. The majority of children attended to the procedure, but did not seek information via questions. This pattern of coping was only partially effective at reducing distress and had no relation to pain. This pattern of coping is discussed within the context of cultural factors that may be important in understanding responses to procedural pain in pediatric sickle cell disease.</description><dc:title>Information-Seeking Coping Behaviors During Painful Procedures in African-American Children with Sickle Cell Disease - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Alyssa M. Schlenz, Jeffrey Schatz, Catherine B. McClellan, Sarah M. Sweitzer, Carla W. Roberts</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.04.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001408/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Turkish Pediatric Surgical Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Assessment and Nonpharmacological and Environmental Methods in Newborns' Pain Relief - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001408/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Effective pain management requires accurate knowledge, attitudes, and assessment skills. The purpose of the present study was to describe Turkish pediatric surgical nurses' knowledge and use of pain assessment and nonpharmacologic and environmental methods in relieving newborn's pain in hospital. The sample consisted of 111 pediatric surgical nurses employed in pediatric surgical unit in 15 university hospitals located in Turkey. A questionnaire was used to measure the nurses' knowledge and use of pain assessment, nonpharmacologic, and environmental methods. Data were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics. Of the nurses that participated in the study, 83.8% were between the ages of 20 and 35 years, 54.1% had a bachelor degree, and 75.7% had a nursing experience ≤10 years. 50.5% stated that physiologic and behavioral indicators used in the assessment of pain in infants. The most commonly used nonpharmacologic methods were giving nonnutritive sucking, skin-to-skin contact, and holding. The most commonly used environmental methods were avoiding talking loudly close to the baby, minimal holding, care when opening and closing of the incubator, avoiding making noise when using wardrobe, drawers, trash, or nearby devices, such as radio and television, avoiding sharp fragrances, such as alcohol, perfume, near the baby, and reducing light sources. Although Turkish pediatric surgical nurses used some of the nonpharmacological and environmental methods in infant's pain relief, there remains a need for more education about pain management and for more frequent use of these methods in clinical care.</description><dc:title>Turkish Pediatric Surgical Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Assessment and Nonpharmacological and Environmental Methods in Newborns' Pain Relief - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Emine Efe, Şevkiye Dikmen, Nuray Altaş, Cem Boneval</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001822/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescent, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of the Impact of Migraines on Adolescents' Social Functioning - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001822/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Migraines dramatically affect adolescents' quality of life. One area of particular importance is the impact of migraines on adolescents' social functioning. To understand the impact of migraines on adolescents' social functioning from multiple informants, we performed semistructured interviews with adolescents who have migraines, their caregivers, and clinicians who treat adolescents who have migraines. Three major themes related to social functioning were identified from the adolescent interviews: The need to be alone; lack of support from siblings; and the feeling of not being understood by others. The caregiver interviews yielded three main themes related to family functioning: that plans can change quickly; that family life revolves around helping the child with the migraine; and parents' feelings of inadequacy in helping their child. There were two main themes derived from the clinician interviews related to perception of family functioning: the importance of parental involvement; and the role of adolescents' school and social lives in migraine prevention. There are a number of unmet needs among adolescents with recurrent migraine and their families. Interviews with adolescents, caregivers, and clinicians suggest a number of areas for intervention.</description><dc:title>A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescent, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of the Impact of Migraines on Adolescents' Social Functioning - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Elizabeth Donovan, Stacey Mehringer, Lonnie K. Zeltzer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001275/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001275/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Despite significant evidence for the integration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into professional nursing practice, gaps exist regarding nurses’ baseline knowledge, beliefs of efficacy, and learning needs for further education to facilitate the integration of CAM into nursing practice. The top three conditions which adults identified for using CAM were back pain, neck pain, and joint pain. CAM can offer nurses additional treatment options for managing their patients’ pain and discomfort. The California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) identifies that nurses can help provide the missing link between conventional Western medicine and CAM therapies. Nurses cannot successfully advocate for CAM therapies, nor understand their patients’ prior use of such treatments, unless they themselves are familiar with both the risks and the benefits of these practices. It is necessary to first establish nurses’ baseline knowledge and beliefs related to CAM so that adequate educational programs can be initiated to help mitigate the barriers to incorporating CAM into the acute care setting. This descriptive study explores registered nurses’ attitudes and knowledge related to CAM by using the Nurse Complementary and Alternative Medicine Nursing Knowledge and Attitudes Survey developed by Rojas-Cooley and Grant. Nurses in this study demonstrated limited self-reported knowledge of basic CAM terminology and CAM practices.</description><dc:title>Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Nurses’ Attitudes and Knowledge - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Tracy Trail-Mahan, Chia-Ling Mao, Karen Bawel-Brinkley</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001287/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Fibromyalgia’s Key Symptoms in Normal-Weight, Overweight, and Obese Female Patients - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001287/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Factors affecting the symptomatology of fibromyalgia (FM) are not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship of weight status with pain, fatigue, and stiffness in Spanish female FM patients, with special focus on the differences between overweight and obese patients. The sample comprised 177 Spanish women with FM (51.3 ± 7.3 years old). We assessed tenderness (using pressure algometry), pain and vitality using the General Health Short-Form Survey (SF36), and pain, fatigue, morning tiredness, and stiffness using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). The international criteria for body mass index was used to classify the patients as normal weight, overweight, or obese. Thirty-two percent were normal-weight, 35% overweight, and 32% obese. Both overweight and obese patients had higher levels of pain than normal-weight patients, as assessed by FIQ and SF36 questionnaires and tender point count (p &lt; .01). The same pattern was observed for algometer score, yet the differences were not significant. Both overweight and obese patients had higher levels of fatigue, and morning tiredness, and stiffness (p &lt; .05) and less vitality than normal-weight patients. No significant differences were observed in any of the variables studied between overweight and obese patients. In conclusion, FM symptomatology in obese patients did not differ from overweight patients, whereas normal-weight patients significantly differed from overweight and obese patients in the studied symptoms. These findings suggest that keeping a healthy (normal) weight is not only associated with decreased risk for developing FM but might also be a relevant and useful way of improving FM symptomatology in women.</description><dc:title>Fibromyalgia’s Key Symptoms in Normal-Weight, Overweight, and Obese Female Patients - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>V.A. Aparicio, F.B. Ortega, A. Carbonell-Baeza, C. Gatto-Cardia, M. Sjöström, J.R. Ruiz, M. Delgado-Fernández</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001317/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Adherence to Guidelines of Pain Assessment and Intervention in Internal Medicine Wards - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001317/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Proper management of pain reduces morbidity, assists in recovery, and increases patient satisfaction. The role of a nurse in an accurate pain evaluation is pivotal. It seems that pain evaluation guidelines are not fully adhered to by nurses. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of pain evaluation and management by nurses in patients admitted in internal medicine wards and to identify groups of patients in which pain evaluation was insufficient. In this cross-sectional study medical records of 59 randomly chosen patients were reviewed: age 64.5 ± 18.5 years, 55% women, and hopitalization length 3.9 ± 1.6 days. Data relating to pain evaluation and management were obtained for every patient–hospitalization day (total 213 patient-days) and compared with the guidelines. Pain was evaluated in 176 out of 213 encounters (66.2%): 84.3% upon admission and 72.7% daily routine evaluation in accordance with guidelines. In 23.7% of evaluations, pain level warranted alleviating treatment (visual analog scale ≥3). However, such treatment was administered in only 29.3% of these cases. Reevaluation after treatment and additional evaluations thereafter were performed in 33.3% and 22% of encounters, respectively. The independent factors associated with the reduced performance of pain evaluation were: widower (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.98; p = .024), reduced level of consicousnness (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95; p = .013), mental disorders as a cause of hospitalization (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94; p = .004), and isolation (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99; p = .03). Pain assessment and management in internal medicine wards is insufficient, especially in the above subgroups. Specific education programs targeted to the latter subgroups and to the unique pain assessment tools are warranted.</description><dc:title>Adherence to Guidelines of Pain Assessment and Intervention in Internal Medicine Wards - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Yehudit Kerner, Ygal Plakht, Artur Shiyovich, Pnina Schlaeffer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-19</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-19</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001330/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pain and Anxiety During Bone Marrow Biopsy - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001330/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A bone marrow biopsy is considered to be painful, often causing anxiety. We observed large differences between patients and wondered which factors cause pain and anxiety. In a prospective study, 202 patients were analyzed. Experienced hematologists and fellows in training (17% of biopsies) performed bone marrow aspirates and biopsies from the posterior iliac crest. Demographics, disease category, performance score, source of information, number of previous biopsies, experience of the hematologist, and length and quality of the biopsy were recorded. Pain and anxiety were measured using a visual analog scale and verbal rating score. Data were subjected to univariate and multivariate regression. The median pain score was 1.9 (range 0-10); 21% did not experience any pain. Anxiety scored 1.8 (range 0-10), and correlated positively with pain (p = .000). By univariate analysis, young age, poor performance, the physician as source of information, and prolonged procedures were associated with more pain. In multivariate analysis, anxiety, information from the physician, and a prolonged procedure persisted. Length or artifacts of the core biopsy did not correlate with pain. In conclusion, bone marrow biopsies performed in an optimal setting by experienced hematologists cause only mild pain, with, however, some patients experienced serious problems. To reduce pain, not only careful local anesthesia, but also the addition of systemic analgesics and especially anxiety reduction seems to be useful.</description><dc:title>Pain and Anxiety During Bone Marrow Biopsy - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Betty Tanasale, Jenne Kits, Philip M. Kluin, Albert Trip, Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001135/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Development and Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001135/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short form of the Brazilian version of McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Three hundred two patients with chronic pain filled out the validated Brazilian long form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (LF-MPQ). Words chosen by ≥25% of the patients were selected to comprise the SF-MPQ. The Brazilian SF-MPQ consisted of 15 descriptors (8 sensory, 5 affective, and 2 evaluative) rated on a binary mode (present or absent). Four pain scores were derived by counting the words chosen by the patients for sensory, affective, evaluative, and total descriptors. The SF-MPQ showed poor internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.52) but possibly acceptable because it showed discriminant validity to discriminate patients presenting different levels and mechanisms of pain, and it was strongly correlated with the LF-MPQ. The low KR-20 coefficient could result from the small number of items. The Brazilian version of the SF-MPQ proved to be a useful instrument to evaluate the different qualities of pain. It is a reliable option to the long-form MPQ.</description><dc:title>Development and Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Karine Azevedo São Leão Ferreira, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.04.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001329/abstract?rss=yes"><title>An Integrative Review of Literature Examining Psychometric Properties of Instruments Measuring Anxiety or Fear in Hospitalized Children - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001329/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Anxiety and fear are among the most frequently reported emotional responses to hospitalization and are known to be contributing factors to pain and other negative patient outcomes. The first step in confronting unnecessary anxiety and fear is to identify valid and clinically feasible assessment instruments. The purpose of this paper is to review and evaluate instruments that measure children’s fear or anxiety associated with hospitalization or painful procedures. A search was conducted of published English-language literature from 1980 through 2010 with the use of Ovid Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Medline, Nursing/Academic Edition, Cinahl, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria specified that the self-report instrument: 1) was developed in English; 2) was developed for and/or widely used with hospitalized children or children undergoing medical procedures or treatment; and 3) had research evidence of psychometric properties from at least five different studies. A comprehensive review of the literature revealed only five fear or anxiety instruments with adequate testing for evaluation of reliability and validity. Although all instruments have beginning psychometric adequacy, no one tool stands out as superior to the others. Therefore, we recommend that researchers and clinicians exercise caution in choosing assessment instruments, balancing potential strengths with reported limitations. Using more than one tool (triangulating) may be one way to achieve more credible results. Knowledge of credible existing instruments alerts us to what is possible today and to the imperative for research that will improve communication with children tomorrow.</description><dc:title>An Integrative Review of Literature Examining Psychometric Properties of Instruments Measuring Anxiety or Fear in Hospitalized Children - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Roxie L. Foster, Jeong-hwan Park</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001366/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cranial Electrical Stimulation Improves Symptoms and Functional Status in Individuals with Fibromyalgia - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001366/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: To investigate the effects of microcurrent cranial electrical stimulation (CES) therapy on reducing pain and its associated symptoms in fibromyalgia (FM), we conducted a randomized, controlled, three-group (active CES device, sham device, and usual care alone [UC]), double-blind study to determine the potential benefit of CES therapy for symptom management in FM. Those individuals using the active CES device had a greater decrease in average pain (p = .023), fatigue (p = .071), and sleep disturbance (p = .001) than individuals using the sham device or those receiving usual care alone over time. Additionally, individuals using the active CES device had improved functional status versus the sham device and UC groups over time (p = .028).</description><dc:title>Cranial Electrical Stimulation Improves Symptoms and Functional Status in Individuals with Fibromyalgia - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ann Gill Taylor, Joel G. Anderson, Shannon L. Riedel, Janet E. Lewis, Patricia A. Kinser, Cheryl Bourguignon</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL STUDY</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001378/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nursing Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Patient-Controlled Oral Analgesia (PCOA) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001378/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Patient-controlled oral analgesia (PCOA) allows patients to self-administer oral opioids for pain management. Advantages of PCOA include improved pain control with lower doses of opioids, decreased length of stay, increased patient satisfaction, and better functional outcomes than conventional nurse-administered oral analgesia. Sucessful PCOA programs are well described in the literature. However, nurses have concerns about allowing patients to self-administer opioids. The purpose of this study was to identify nurses’ knowledge and beliefs regarding PCOA. Nurses who work at the Holland Orthopaedic and Arthritic Centre were asked to complete a survey exploring their beliefs regarding PCOA. The nurses were asked to complete the same survey twice: before an education program in February 2010, and 3 months after implementation of PCOA in June 2010. In February 2010, 74 nurses and in June 2010, 32 nurses participated in the survey. Some nurses (18%) had previous experience with PCOA. At both the pre-education and the postimplementation times, nurses thought that the PCOA program reduced wait times for analgesics and improved patient satisfaction with pain management. Before program implementation, negative beliefs included that patients on the PCOA program would lose their analgesics, would give their analgesics to visitors or other patients, and were at risk for having their analgesics stolen and that the nurse was liable if the patient’s analgesics were lost or stolen. After program implementation, no nurse believed that patients would lose their analgesics or give their analgesics to visitors or other patients or that they were liable for lost or stolen analgesics. However, nurses continued to think that patients were at risk for having their analgesics stolen. We found that nurses were concerned that analgesics could be lost, misused, or stolen and that they would be liable for lost analgesics. These findings were consistent with literature discussing patients’ outcomes regarding PCOA. However, after education and experience these concerns decreased or resolved. It is important to address these concerns before PCOA program implementation.</description><dc:title>Nursing Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Patient-Controlled Oral Analgesia (PCOA) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Monakshi Sawhney, Eri Maeda</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100124X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Decoding the Role of Epigenetics and Genomics in Pain Management - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421100124X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Persistent pain is a costly epidemic, affecting &gt;50 million Americans with estimated expenditures of &gt;$200 billion annually for direct care and lost productivity. Recent advances in epigenetic/genomic understanding of pain and analgesic response may lead to improvements in pain management and help curtail costs by providing more precise detection of the pain mechanisms involved and thereby more personalized and effective treatments. However, the translation of epigenetic and genomic strategies for pain management into clinical practice will depend on understanding their potential applications. The purpose of this article is to examine current knowledge about epigenetic and genomic mechanisms of persistent pain and potential opportunities for improving pain management. The initial discussion focuses on present understanding of nociceptive pathways and alterations that lead to pathologic pain. The discussion then moves to a review of epigenetic mechanisms that have been identified in the transition to and maintenance of persistent pain as well as in the individual’s response to analgesics. Potential applications of epigenetics/genomics to identify people at risk and possibly prevent persistent pain and guide diagnosis and the selection of therapeutic modalities are presented.</description><dc:title>Decoding the Role of Epigenetics and Genomics in Pain Management - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Angela R. Starkweather, Vincent E. Pair</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-08-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-08-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001238/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Patterns and Clinical Correlates of Pain Among Brain Injury Patients in Critical Care Assessed with the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001238/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This study was conducted to assess the patterns and clinical correlates of acute pain in brain injury patients during the critical care period using the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). Data were collected from 31 brain-injury patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital located in Incheon, Republic of Korea. Glasgow Coma Scale and CPOT scores were assessed on days 1, 3, 6, 9, and 14 after ICU admission. Results showed that temporal changes in pain intensity displayed a consistent pattern in critical care patients with a brain injury during the first 14 days of ICU admission. Mean pain score was highest on day 1, decreased rapidly to reach a minimum on day 3 or 6, and then increased on day 9. In most patients, pain reduced slightly on day 14. Mean CPOT scores were significantly higher in the nonsurgery group than in the surgery group. There was also a nonsignificant trend of higher pain intensity scores among patients with moderate brain injury compared with those with severe injury. CPOT scores immediately after endotracheal suctioning were significantly higher than before endotracheal suctioning, but CPOT scores 20 minutes after suctioning were similar to those before suctioning. The present study may be meaningful in terms of presenting valid clinical information regarding the patterns and characteristics of acute pain in brain injury patients who are often unable to self-report on the presence and intensity of pain.</description><dc:title>Patterns and Clinical Correlates of Pain Among Brain Injury Patients in Critical Care Assessed with the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>KangIm Lee, HyunSoo Oh, YeonOk Suh, WhaSook Seo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-21</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-21</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001123/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pain Management Education in Long-Term Care: It Can Make a Difference - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001123/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Acute and chronic pain management for persons residing in long-term care settings is a serious problem. In an effort to change practice in pain management and improve resident outcomes, the Campaign Against Pain education program was instituted at Beatitudes Health Care Center in Phoenix, Arizona. In this pilot study, professional and certified nursing assistant (CNA) staff were surveyed before and after the training program to ascertain change in knowledge, attitudes, and barriers about pain. After the intensive training program and onsite consultation with the concomitant changes in policies, procedures, and documentation, professional and CNA staff knowledge improved after 6 months (F = 6.273; p = .02), attitudes changed (F = 12.26; p = .002), and barriers were mitigated. With a comprehensive quality improvement pain plan in place, the findings suggest that education in pain management in long-term care and program changes that adopt best practices in pain can make a difference.</description><dc:title>Pain Management Education in Long-Term Care: It Can Make a Difference - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Carol O. Long</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.04.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001159/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Review of Pain Content in Three-Year Preregistration Pediatric Nursing Courses in the United Kingdom - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001159/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The results of several studies suggest that gaps remain in nurses' knowledge about pain in children, and particularly regarding pain assessment, analgesic drugs, and nondrug methods, suggesting a need to explore the pain content of preregistration nursing curricula. Over the past decade, the way nurse education is delivered has changed with the advent of the internet and the use of virtual learning environments. This study, therefore, explored the depth and breadth of pain content in 3-year preregistration pediatric nursing courses across the U.K. as well as ascertaining how this content is delivered. The leads for pediatric nursing at all 56 U.K. higher education institutions running the 3-year preregistration pediatric nursing course were e-mailed a questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate whether topics are covered in the program, and if so how it was delivered. Results suggest that preregistration pediatric nursing courses in the U.K. do not always equip students to manage pain effectively in clinical practice. There appears to be limited content on pain in nursing curricula, with several institutions not covering key topics. Most teaching is delivered face to face with limited workbooks and virtual learning activities. Further research is needed in this area to ascertain the impact of this on the quality of care provided.</description><dc:title>Review of Pain Content in Three-Year Preregistration Pediatric Nursing Courses in the United Kingdom - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Alison Twycross, Lynda Roderique</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-11</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-11</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001160/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Methods Used by Female Nurses and Lay Women for Everyday Pain Management - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001160/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: There are numerous types of pain, with different clinical meanings. Everyday pain might be experienced by everyone under different stressors, such as lack of sleep, alcohol overuse, stay in a stuffy room, and physical overstressors. It also might be related to a job character or attitudes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the methods for the management of everyday pain used by female nurses and lay women. Headaches and back pain were the most common pains reported among the female population included in this study. Analgesic use was the most common method for management of everyday pain. Nurses used prescription medicine and other methods. Lay women used over-the-counter analgesics more often. There is a significant tendency to exceed the maximum analgesic dose when treating migraines, total body pain, and toothaches. The majority of all of the women included in this study used analgesics according to recommendations. Nurses were found to underuse analgesics and lay women to overuse the recommended dose. Speed and safety were identified as key factors driving studied respondents’ decisions when treating pain.</description><dc:title>Methods Used by Female Nurses and Lay Women for Everyday Pain Management - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Monika Binkowska-Bury, Pawel Januszewicz, Maja Wolan, Marek Sobolewski, Artur Mazur</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-11</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-11</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001147/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Early Experience with a Brief, Multimodal, Multidisciplinary Treatment Program for Fibromyalgia - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001147/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Fibromyalgia is a complex heterogeneous disorder for which a multidisciplinary individualized approach is currently advocated. We executed a 1-week multidisciplinary fibromyalgia clinical program with seven patients, based on our experience with our existing 1.5-day multidisciplinary fibromyalgia program that has demonstrated both short- and long-term benefits. The current expanded program was not designed as a clinical study, but rather as a clinical feasibility assessment, and it was multidisciplinary in nature, with cognitive behavioral therapy, activity pacing, and graded exercise therapy as major components. We assessed changes in individual patients at 1 week and 3 months after the program with the use of validated self-report measures of pain, fatigue, and self-efficacy. All patients indicated at least small improvements in pain and physical symptoms at both 1 week and 3 months, and all but one patient showed improvement in self-efficacy at 1 week and 3 months. Similar trends were observed for fatigue. Based on our early clinical experience, we conclude that the 1-week multidisciplinary fibromyalgia program is logistically feasible and has potential for clinical efficacy. Further research is needed and is planned to test the clinical efficacy of this program and compare it with other interventions.</description><dc:title>Early Experience with a Brief, Multimodal, Multidisciplinary Treatment Program for Fibromyalgia - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ann Vincent, Mary O. Whipple, Terry H. Oh, Janet A. Guderian, Debra L. Barton, Connie A. Luedtke</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.05.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-07-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-07-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000828/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia: Is It Clinically Relevant for the Treatment of Pain Patients? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211000828/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: There is a curious and paradoxic phenomenon, reliably demonstrated in animal models, that consists of an increased sensitivity to pain that is apparently induced by the very opioid drugs used to ameliorate the pain. This phenomenon is termed “opioid-induced hyperalgesia.” Whether opioid-induced hyperalgesia occurs in humans, and, if so, to what extent and consequence, is far less established. This is a critical question for attempting to treat pain. If opioid-induced hyperalgesia develops in a patient, it would masquerade as tolerance (because the clinical effectiveness of the opioid would be diminished), yet the appropriate clinical adjustment would be precisely the opposite to that of tolerance. It would be to decrease, rather than increase, the dose of opioid. We review the evidence, particularly the clinical evidence, about opioid-induced hyperalgesia and the postulated mechanisms. We conclude that given the clinical ramifications, opioid-induced hyperalgesia is one of the most understudied important aspects of opioid research.</description><dc:title>Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia: Is It Clinically Relevant for the Treatment of Pain Patients? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Robert B. Raffa, Joseph V. Pergolizzi</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.04.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-06-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-06-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001111/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nursing Ward Managers’ Perceptions of Pain Prevalence at the Aged-Care Facilities in Japan: A Nationwide Survey - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904211001111/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This study aimed to examine nursing ward managers’ perceptions of pain prevalence among older residents and the strategies of pain management at the Health Service Facilities for the Elderly Requiring Care (HSFERC) in Japan and to investigate the factors related to the prevalence. Nursing ward managers in 3,644 HSFERC were asked to participate in this study. Questionnaires were sent to them regarding pain prevalence among the older residents in their wards, their provisions for pain care, and other pain management strategies. The perceived pain prevalence factors were examined statistically. The final sample comprised 439 participants (12.0%). A total of 5,219 residents (22.3%) were recognized as suffering from pain on the investigation day. Only 8 wards (1.8%) used pain management guidelines or care manuals, and 14 (3.2%) used a standardized pain scale. The ward managers’ age (p = .008) and nursing experience (p = .006) showed a significant negative association with pain prevalence estimation. Moreover, there was a significant association between the groups’ pain prevalence estimation and the nursing managers’ beliefs that older adults were less sensitive to pain (p = .01), that pain was common among older people (p = .007), and that the time to treat residents’ pain was insufficient (p = .001). The ward managers’ perceptions regarding pain prevalence varied; the perceived pain rates were possibly lower than the actual percentages. Insufficient pain management strategies at the HSFERC were also suggested. An appropriate pain management strategy for Japanese aged care and its dissemination are urgently required.</description><dc:title>Nursing Ward Managers’ Perceptions of Pain Prevalence at the Aged-Care Facilities in Japan: A Nationwide Survey - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Yukari Takai, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani, Hiroki Fukahori, Sayuri Kobayashi, Yumi Chiba</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2011.04.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-06-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-06-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>
