<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Pain Management Nursing - Articles in Press</title><description>Pain Management Nursing RSS feed: Articles in Press. This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles 
from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional 
features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.</description><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1524-9042</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001337/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000160/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000755/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000767/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421000086X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000329/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000779/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001325/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000196/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001052/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001222/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000330/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001040/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001210/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000903/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001027/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900068X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001015/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000526/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001234/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000575/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900054X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000666/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000551/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000563/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000678/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001337/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Factors That Influence Patient Advocacy by Pain Management Nurses: Results of the American Society for Pain Management Nursing Survey - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001337/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: What is the meaning of advocacy, and how does it relate to the nurse who wants patients to experience optimum pain management? This question and the lack of empirical data provided the stimulus for the American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) Research Committee to explore ASPMN members' beliefs, knowledge, and skills regarding pain management advocacy activities. The specific aim of the study was to determine the educational needs for and barriers of advocacy for nurses working with patients experiencing pain. An ASPMN Advocacy Survey Instrument was developed to gather data about advocacy activities and interventions. The sample consisted of 188 ASPMN nurses (20% of the membership) who responded via the internet. Study findings revealed that the majority of nurse respondents were active in personal advocacy, serving as guardians of the patient. They confronted physicians as necessary and assisted patients to evaluate their pain management. Regarding making the public aware of pain management–related issues (i.e., public awareness advocacy), the respondents were not as active. Respondents were knowledgeable about pain management and best practices/best evidence, with the exceptions of legislative issues and media training. These two areas need support and educational intervention. Additional areas in need of education and training, as identified by respondents, are social and political advocacy interventions. “Lack of time” was identified as the barrier to advocacy experienced by the greatest number of nurses.</description><dc:title>Factors That Influence Patient Advocacy by Pain Management Nurses: Results of the American Society for Pain Management Nursing Survey - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Laurie Jowers Ware, Patricia Bruckenthal, Gail C. Davis, Susan K. O'Conner-Von</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.12.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000160/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Risk Factors for Opioid-Induced Excessive Respiratory Depression - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000160/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Opioid use has increased significantly over the past ten years and so has the incidence of reportable adverse events, such as respiratory depression and/or arrest. It is important for nurses to understand and know how to assess patients for risk factors for respiratory depression secondary to opioid therapy. This paper presents the pharmacodynamics of opioids, the risk factors for excessive respiratory depression, recommendations for identifying patients at high risk, and interventions to prevent adverse effects. After reading this paper, nurses will have the knowledge to provide safe administration of opioid medications for the management of acute pain.</description><dc:title>Risk Factors for Opioid-Induced Excessive Respiratory Depression - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Carla R. Jungquist, Suzanne Karan, Michael L. Perlis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.02.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000755/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Is Pain Assessment Feasible as a Performance Indicator for Dutch Nursing Homes? A Cross-Sectional Approach - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000755/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Quality of care gains transparency with the help of performance indicators. For Dutch nursing homes, the current set of performance indicators does not include pain. To determine the feasibility of pain assessment as performance indicator, information about pain prevalence and analgesic prescription in one nursing home was collected. Within the time span of 3 days, pain intensity was measured in 91% of the residents (201 out of 221), either with a numeric rating scale, a verbal rating scale, or the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale (REPOS). Numerical rating was used for 72%, verbal rating for 3%, and REPOS observation for 25% of the residents. Pain was substantial in 65 residents (32%), who received the following analgesic prescription: World Health Organization (WHO) step 1, 45%; WHO step 3, 12%; and neuroactive agents, 5%. Thirty-eight percent of these residents were in pain and received no analgesics. Residents with substantial pain significantly more often received analgesics (p = .007). Results suggest that pain assessment is feasible in a nursing home and would stimulate staff attention to pain. Further investigation is necessary to find out if a pain algorithm is feasible and will lead to improved pain treatment.</description><dc:title>Is Pain Assessment Feasible as a Performance Indicator for Dutch Nursing Homes? A Cross-Sectional Approach - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Anneke A. Boerlage, Anniek D. Masman, Jacobus Hagoort, Dick Tibboel, Frans P.M. Baar, Monique van Dijk</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.05.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000767/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pain Experience of the Elderly - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000767/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Too often, the elderly suffer silently and needlessly with chronic pain. To investigate the pain experience of the elderly living in the community, a descriptive research design was used. The aims of the study were to determine the prevalence of pain in an older population living in the community, to obtain a description of the older adult's pain experience, and to determine strategies used to manage their pain. The results of the study indicated that &gt;90% of the elderly living in the community experienced pain within the past month, with 41% reporting discomforting, distressing, horrible, or excruciating pain. Musculoskeletal pain was found to be the most predominant pain, and inactivity was the most effective strategy used to lessen pain. Pain in the elderly continues to be a challenge which needs to be addressed more effectively by health care providers. Based on the high prevalence of pain experienced by the elderly and the expected demographic shifts in the next two decades, it is imperative to continue research in this area to assure the highest quality of life, as well as maximum functional ability, for the elderly. Health care providers need to understand the multidimensional pain experience that occurs in the daily life of the community-dwelling older adult and the most effective management strategies that can be used to provide pain relief.</description><dc:title>Pain Experience of the Elderly - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sylvia T. Brown, Mary K. Kirkpatrick, Melvin S. Swanson, Ila Leigh McKenzie</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.05.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421000086X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Concept Analysis of Nurses' Identification of Pain in Demented Patients in a Nursing Home: Development of a Hybrid Model - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490421000086X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pain is a subjective feeling, with no known biologic markers. Proof of its presence and measurement of intensity rely entirely on self-reporting by the patient. The hampered or abrogated ability of demented patients to report their pain is a major difficulty in pain assessment and management. The purpose of this study was to clarify and conceptualize pain identification in demented patients by nurses. The hybrid model of concept development was used in the development of a conceptual structure of pain in demented patients. Data were collected by literature review (theoretical phase) and among nurses caring for demented patients in three nursing homes in South Korea (fieldwork phase). The 13 nurses involved each reported &gt;3 years' nursing home experience. In a hybrid model, pain identification in demented patients by nurses constituted an active daily process of integrating patient expressional cues during periods of pain and pain relief and involving three dimensions: identification schemes based on the stage and type of dementia, connecting assessments after each intervention, and cognitive efforts to establish the origin of pain. Identification of pain in demented patients by nurses is a complex process. More research is needed to formulate an assessment tool and pain management strategies for patients with dementia.</description><dc:title>Concept Analysis of Nurses' Identification of Pain in Demented Patients in a Nursing Home: Development of a Hybrid Model - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sung Ok Chang, Younjae Oh, Eun Young Park, Geun Myun Kim, Suk Yong Kil</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.05.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000329/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Sensitization Model to Explain How Chronic Pain Exists Without Tissue Damage - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000329/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The interaction of nurses with chronic pain patients is often difficult. One of the reasons is that chronic pain is difficult to explain, because no obvious anatomic defect or tissue damage is present. There is now enough evidence available indicating that chronic pain syndromes such as low back pain, whiplash, and fibromyalgia share the same pathogenesis, namely, sensitization of pain modulating systems in the central nervous system. Sensitization is a neuropathic pain mechanism in which neurophysiologic changes may be as important as behavioral, psychologic, and environmental mechanisms. The sensitization model provides nurses with an opportunity to explain pain as a physical cause related to changes in the nervous system. This explanation may improve the patient's motivation to discuss the importance of psychosocial factors that contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain. In this article, sensitization is described as a model that can be used for the explanation of the existence of chronic pain. The sensitization model is described using a metaphor. The sensitization model is a useful tool for nurses in their communication and education toward patients.</description><dc:title>The Sensitization Model to Explain How Chronic Pain Exists Without Tissue Damage - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>C. Paul van Wilgen, Doeke Keizer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.03.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000779/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Acceptance of Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injured Persons: A Qualitative Approach - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000779/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) in spinal cord injury (SCI) is a significant problem that has physical, functional, and psychosocial repercussions beyond the consequences of SCI. The notion that acceptance may be a viable alternative to suffering when resolution of pain is unattainable was explored. Studies indicate that acceptance of pain is associated with lower pain intensity, less pain-related anxiety and avoidance, less depression, less physical and psychosocial disability, more daily active time, and improved work status in patients who have other types of chronic pain. This exploratory qualitative study examined acceptance of pain in SCI individuals who have CNP. Grounded theory was used to develop a conceptual framework to describe acceptance in people with CNP and SCI. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews with seven SCI individuals. Six phases were identified, including: “comprehending the perplexity of CNP,” “seeking pain resolution,” “acknowledging pain permanence,” “redefining core values,” “learning to live with the pain,” and “integrating pain.” Two driving forces, “increasing independence” and “evolving pain view,” were noted to move the process of acceptance forward. The findings in this study suggest that acceptance of pain appeared to be beneficial in terms of reducing suffering and facilitating a more satisfying and fulfilling life in these SCI individuals. A decreased emphasis on continued searching for a cure for CNP and movement toward a self-management approach was associated with increased pain coping for these SCI individuals. Clinical implications suggest that early intervention to facilitate effective coping and an exploration of the notion of acceptance could be beneficial.</description><dc:title>Acceptance of Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injured Persons: A Qualitative Approach - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Penelope Henwood, Jacqueline Ellis, Jo Logan, Claire-Jehanne Dubouloz, Joyce D'Eon</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.05.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001325/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Education Changes Mexican Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pediatric Pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001325/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: This study explored the effectiveness of a pain education intervention on Mexican nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric pain. A convenience sample of 106 registered nurses from three hospitals in Mexico City was recruited. A Pediatric Pain Education Program (PPEP) was developed, implemented, and evaluated by a nurse researcher, clinical nurse specialist, and a child life specialist. The 4-hour program, which was translated into Spanish, consisted of pain assessment, physiology, and management, including pharmacology and nonpharmacology. The effects of PPEP were measured in a one-group pretest-posttest design using a translated Spanish version of the Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey (PNKAS). A total of 79 nurses completed both tests. A paired t test indicated significant differences between pre- and posttest results (p &lt; .0001) on the PNKAS. The hospital site and years of nursing experience were significantly related to nurses' pre- and post-PNKAS scores. One test item on children's ability to reliably report their pain had a significantly lower score after the intervention (p = .016). The intervention was effective in improving Mexican pediatric nurses' knowledge and attitudes. However, it is not known how long this effect was maintained. Health care professionals can share a common vision for pain management by increasing international collaborative efforts and by advancing pediatric pain knowledge.</description><dc:title>Education Changes Mexican Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pediatric Pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Myra Martz Huth, Theresa L. Gregg, Li Lin</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.11.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000196/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Predictors and Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Procedural Pain Associated with Turning among Hospitalized Adults - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000196/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Many hospitalized adults cannot reposition themselves in their beds. Therefore, they are regularly turned by their nurses, primarily to prevent pressure ulcer formation. Earlier research indicates that turning is painful and that patients are rarely premedicated with analgesics. Nonpharmacologic interventions may be used to help with this painful procedure. However, no published research was found on the use of nonpharmacologic interventions for turning of hospitalized patients. The objectives of this study were: 1) to describe patient pain characteristics during turning and their association with patient demographic and clinical characteristics; 2) to determine the frequency of use of various nonpharmacologic interventions for hospitalized adult patients undergoing the painful procedure of turning; and 3) to identify factors that predict the use of specific nonpharmacologic interventions for pain associated with turning. Hospitalized adult patients who experienced turning, the nurses caring for them, and others who were present at the time of turning were asked if they used various nonpharmacologic interventions to manage pain during the turning. Out of 1,395 patients, 92.5% received at least one nonpharmacologic intervention. Most frequently used were calming voice (65.7%), information (60.6%), and deep breathing (37.9%). Critical-care patients were more likely to receive a calming voice (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, p &lt; .01), receive information (OR 1.62, p &lt; .001), and use deep breathing (OR= 1.36, p &lt; .05) than those who were not critical-care patients. Those reporting higher pain were consistently more likely to receive each of the three interventions (OR 1.01, p &lt; .05 for all 3). In conclusion, nonpharmacologic interventions are used frequently during a turning procedure. The specific interventions used most often are ones that can be initiated spontaneously. Our data suggest that patients, nurses, and family members respond to patients' turning-related pain by using nonpharmacologic interventions.</description><dc:title>Predictors and Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Procedural Pain Associated with Turning among Hospitalized Adults - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Bonnie Faigeles, Jill Howie-Esquivel, Christine Miaskowski, Julie Stanik-Hutt, Carol Thompson, Cheri White, Lorie Rietman Wild, Kathleen Puntillo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.02.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-05</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-05</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001052/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pain in Children with Down Syndrome: Assessment and Intervention by Parents - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001052/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aims of this study were: 1) to describe how parents assess pain in their child with Down syndrome; and 2) to examine the relationship between pain assessment and decisions by parents to intervene to relieve pain in the child. Twelve parents of school-age children with Down syndrome (ages 6-12 years) were interviewed. Data analysis followed Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence (1979). This included domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, componential analysis, and theme development. Four themes emerged from the data analysis. Theme 1: Being sensitive to verbal and behavioral attributes of pain in the child. Parents reported that they assessed pain in their child with Down syndrome through the child's use of words to express pain, pointing or showing pain location, crying, changes in usual activities, and seeking closeness to the parent. Theme 2: Recognizing emotional and social responses to pain. Parents reported that emotional responses (e.g., anger, fear, frustration, acting out) were part of the pain expressions of their child with Down syndrome. Theme 3: Identifying differences in pain expressions between child and siblings. Parents used strategies to assess pain based on their beliefs that the child was less verbal, slower to complain, and less bothered by pain than siblings. Strategies included questioning the child to elicit self-reporting of pain and observing the child's behaviors. Theme 4: Making decisions to intervene. Parents reported that actions to relieve pain in their child with Down syndrome included more psychologic measures than physical measures, but otherwise no differences were noted in the actions taken for the child and the child's siblings.</description><dc:title>Pain in Children with Down Syndrome: Assessment and Intervention by Parents - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Roswitha B. Davies</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.09.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-06-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-06-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001222/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Use, Perceived Effectiveness, and Gender Differences of Pain Relief Strategies Among the Community-Dwelling Elderly in Taiwan - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001222/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pain is a common problem among the elderly. The entire scope of chronic pain relief strategies used by community elderly is still unclear. A limited number of studies have investigated this issue from diverse culture perspectives. In the present study, we investigated the use and perceived effectiveness of pain relief strategies adopted by the elderly; gender differences between frequently used relief strategies were also explored. Two hundred nineteen participants living in Taiwan City, Taiwan, were recruited by a random sampling method and interviewed face to face. The prevalence of chronic pain among the elderly was 42.0% (n=92). The elderly tended to adopt multiple strategies (mean±SD=9.08±3.56; range=2-18) to relieve their chronic pain. In three domains of pain relief strategies, conventional medicine was used more frequently than complementary and alternative medicine and psychologic approaches. Most pain relief strategies were ineffective. Among the 22 strategies used, no strategy was reported as “much improved” by a majority of users. The top five pain relief strategies used by men and women were the same. Elderly women tended to adopt more psychologic approaches, such as acceptance and ignoring to relieve pain, than men. The findings suggest that nurses should pay more attention to the issue of chronic pain relief and provide the elderly with more effective pain relief strategies.</description><dc:title>Use, Perceived Effectiveness, and Gender Differences of Pain Relief Strategies Among the Community-Dwelling Elderly in Taiwan - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Hsing-Yi Yu, Fu-In Tang, Ming-Chen Yeh, Benjamin Ing-Tiau Kuo, Shu Yu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.10.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-06-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-06-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000330/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of Methylprednisolone Injection Speed on the Perception of Intramuscular Injection Pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904210000330/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Pain originating from intramuscular (IM) injection should not be underestimated, because a painful injection might incite severe fear of injection, which may lead a patient to delay seeking medical help. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of two different IM methylprednisolone injection speeds on pain intensity and pain duration. A one-group quasiexperimental design was used to study 10-second versus 30-second injection durations. According to the formula for one sample using average values, 25 patients were recruited from a dermatology clinic. Data were collected using the “Patient Characteristics Form” and the visual analog scale (VAS). The mean difference in pain levels according to the VAS in the postinjection period was significantly higher with administration of IM methylprednisolone in 10 seconds compared with 30-second administration (VAS 1.9 vs. 1.3; p &lt; .05). The severity of pain peaked at 0 minutes for both injection speeds, but the duration of pain was longer with 10-second injections. The data showed that at multiple time points after 10-second injections, men and patients &gt;40 years old experienced greater pain severity. Pain severity after 30-second injections was greater for patients of normal or low weight who had completed higher levels of education. In conclusion, slow IM injection of steroids improves pain management.</description><dc:title>Effect of Methylprednisolone Injection Speed on the Perception of Intramuscular Injection Pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Leyla Ozdemir, Emine Pιnarcι, Bengu Nisa Akay, Aynur Akyol</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2010.03.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-06-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-06-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001040/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Effect of Cold Application in Combination with Standard Analgesic Administration on Pain and Anxiety during Chest Tube Removal: A Single-Blinded, Randomized, Double-Controlled Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001040/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cold application on pain and anxiety during chest tube removal (CTR) in patients who had undergone cardiac surgery. A single-blinded randomized design was used in this study. Ninety patients aged 18-74 years, hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), who had a chest tube for a duration of at least 24hours were used for this convenience sample. The application of cold, placebo, or control therapies was randomized into three different groups. Sixty minutes before CTR was scheduled, an ICU nurse administered 10mg/kg paracetamol intravenously to all study subjects. Cold and warm packs covered with gauze dressing were applied to the area surrounding the chest tubes for 20minutes. Pain intensity, pain quality and situational anxiety for CTR were measured. Variance analysis and the latent growth model were used in the analysis of the data. Patients in the cold group had significantly lower pain intensity than the placebo group. The perception of pain intensity measured by visual analog scores of patients in the cold group showed the least variation. There was no statistically significant difference in McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire scores or in change of anxiety level between the three groups. The application of cold prolonged the length of time until analgesics were needed after CTR. Results showed that cold application reduced patients' intensity of pain due to CTR but did not affect anxiety levels or the type of pain. Cold application is recommended as a pain-relieving technique during CTR.</description><dc:title>The Effect of Cold Application in Combination with Standard Analgesic Administration on Pain and Anxiety during Chest Tube Removal: A Single-Blinded, Randomized, Double-Controlled Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Yurdanur Demir, Leyla Khorshıd</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.09.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001210/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of a Virtual Pain Coach on Older Adults' Pain Communication: A Pilot Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001210/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A randomized posttest-only double blind design was used to pilot test the effect of a virtual practitioner pain communication coach on older adults' communication of their osteoarthritis pain. Baseline pain intensity and pain interference with activities were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Thirty older adults watched a video of a practitioner describing important osteoarthritis pain information followed by either a virtual practitioner coach, a video practitioner coach, or no coach. Participants were next asked, via a videotaped health care practitioner, to orally describe their pain as if speaking to their own practitioner. The amount of important distinctive pain information described by the older adults was audiotaped, transcribed, content analyzed, and summed using a priori criteria from the American Pain Society osteoarthritis pain management guidelines. Older adults described M=6.3 (SD=3.17), M=3.0 (SD=2.08), and M=5.2 (SD=2.40) items of important pain information as a result of the virtual coach, video coach, and no coach conditions, respectively; F(2,25)=3.17, p=.06, η2=.01. Older adults who practiced talking with the virtual coach described more than one additional item of important pain information. The clinically significant group difference supports the need to test the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. The virtual coaching and education intervention might enable older adults to communicate their pain management information more effectively to their practitioners.</description><dc:title>Effect of a Virtual Pain Coach on Older Adults' Pain Communication: A Pilot Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Deborah Dillon McDonald, Timothy Gifford, Stephen Walsh</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.10.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000903/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nursing Care, Delirium, and Pain Management for the Hospitalized Older Adult - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000903/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Delirium is a reversible cognitive disorder that has a rapid onset. Delirium risk factors include older age, severity of illness, poorer baseline functional status, comorbid medical conditions, and dementia. There are adverse consequences of delirium, including increased length of stay and increased mortality. Therefore, it is important for nurses to identify clients at risk and prevent and manage delirium in the hospitalized older client. Once high-risk clients are identified, prevention strategies may be used to reduce the incidence. Examples of prevention strategies include providing glasses and working hearing aids and effective pain management. This article discusses various assessment instruments that detect the presence of delirium. With this information, nurses are better equipped to evaluate the best assessment options for their work setting. Early detection is crucial to reduce the adverse consequences of delirium. Once a client is found to be experiencing delirium, a treatment plan can be established using both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. In addition, the identification and the correction of etiologies of delirium can shorten the course of delirium.</description><dc:title>Nursing Care, Delirium, and Pain Management for the Hospitalized Older Adult - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ann M. Schreier</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.07.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-04-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-04-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001027/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Malingering? No Evidence in a Predominantly Hispanic Workers' Compensation Population with Chronic Pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001027/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Providers suspect malingering when patients seek compensation for injury or when pain is unconfirmed via objective evidence, judged disproportionate to the cause, or recalcitrant to treatment. Suspicions or claims of malingering may prejudice treatment or reimbursement decisions. The purpose of this archival study was to identify malingering in a predominantly Hispanic workers' compensation population seeking treatment for pain. We used a correlational archival research design to collect data from the medical records of 91 patients treated over a 10-year period in a specialty clinic. Inclusion criteria included individuals with psychologic evaluation for persistent pain that affected function. Using a priori power analysis for a medium effect size, power of .80, and alpha of .05, data from 85 medical records were necessary to meet correlational significance. The study sample reflects the ethnicity, educational level, and socioeconomic status of the larger U.S.-Mexico border community. The majority (93%) had workers' compensation and about one-third had active litigation. No one was diagnosed with malingering or pain disorder with primarily psychologic origins. Depression coexisted with chronic pain, and patients reported serious impairment in physical, occupational, and social function an average of 5 years after the onset of chronic pain. However, the vast majority of patients returned to work. In our experience, there is no place for the labeling and resultant stigma of malingering in chronic pain sufferers.</description><dc:title>Malingering? No Evidence in a Predominantly Hispanic Workers' Compensation Population with Chronic Pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kristynia M. Robinson, Jose J. Monsivais</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.08.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-04-12</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-04-12</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900068X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Low-Dose Ketamine via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Device after Various Transthoracic Procedures Improves Analgesia and Patient and Family Satisfaction - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900068X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Ketamine was recently shown to attenuate postoperative pain when used in combination with morphine in patients who had undergone general and orthopedic surgery. We assessed its effects in 46 patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, off-pump coronary artery bypass, or thoracotomy and correlated them with patient and family satisfaction. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was available for 72hours. One group received 2mg/bolus morphine randomly and double-blindly (group MO), and another group received 1mg morphine plus 5mg ketamine/bolus (group MK), both using IV-PCA. The patients' pain and satisfaction rates were assessed three times daily during hospitalization using a visual analog scale. Their families' satisfaction was assessed as well. Although the 3-day mean amount of morphine used by the MK patients was approximately 60% of that used by the MO patients, their levels of pain and satisfaction were better than those of the MO group. There was an inverted and statistically significant correlation between the patients' level of satisfaction on the second postoperative day (POD) and the satisfaction of their families on POD 2, 3, and 7 and the POD 3 patients' pain assessment in the MK group but not in the MO group. There were no differences in hemodynamic, respiratory, side effects, or complication rates between the groups. The conclusion is that the effects of adding a small ketamine dose to half of the standard morphine dose via IV-PCA after thoracotomy was superior to the standard morphine dose in terms of the patients' self–reported pain score and satisfaction, as well as the family satisfaction rate.</description><dc:title>Low-Dose Ketamine via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Device after Various Transthoracic Procedures Improves Analgesia and Patient and Family Satisfaction - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Shoshana Chazan, Inon Buda, Nahum Nesher, Joseph Paz, Avi A. Weinbroum</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.06.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-06</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001015/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Postoperative Pain: Acupuncture versus Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001015/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of traditional acupuncture compared with acupuncture with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) on postoperative surgical pain relief in gynecologic oncology patients. Twenty postoperative gynecologic oncology patients were randomly assigned into the two groups, and the intervention was initiated within 24 hours after surgery. The patients in each group received four treatments in the subsequent 48 hours, with 12 hours between each treatment. Either traditional acupuncture needles or acupuncture needles with a pulsed electric current were applied to stimulate the area of points Sp6 and Sp8 near the saphenous nerve. Pain measurement instruments included a visual analog scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Although the PENS treatment group demonstrated a consistent decrease in pain with each treatment application compared with the traditional acupuncture group, after 48 hours both groups experienced equivalent pain relief.</description><dc:title>Postoperative Pain: Acupuncture versus Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Stas Gavronsky, Rebecca Koeniger-Donohue, Julie Steller, Joellen W. Hawkins</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.08.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-06</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-06</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000526/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pain Assessment Tool in the Critically Ill Post–Open Heart Surgery Patient Population - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000526/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Critical-care patients are at higher risk for untreated pain, because they are often unable to communicate owing to altered mental status, mechanical ventilation, and sedation. Pain that is persistent and untreated affects most body systems and results in development of complications chronic pain, and increased length of stay. This descriptive repeated-measures study compared three pain assessment tools in nonverbal critically ill patients in a cardiac postanesthesia care unit (n=24). Tools included the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), adult Nonverbal Pain Scale (NVPS), and the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale (FLACC). Two painful events, suctioning and repositioning, were studied. Data were collected immediately before the event, 1minute after, and 20minutes after. Both the CPOT and the NVPS demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach alpha coefficients 0.89). The NVPS and the CPOT were highly correlated for both raters (r&gt;0.80, p=.00) (11 out of 12 times). Correlations between the two raters was generally moderate to high, but higher with the CPOT. There was more disagreement between raters in overall pain scores for the NVPS. When raters disagreed, it was most often in rating the face component on both scales. Disagreement was highest during the event. Both scales adequately capture pain in the nonverbal sedated critically ill patient based on assessment of patients' face, body movements, muscle tension, and respirations, with the NVPS also considering vital signs. Pictures depicting facial expressions for scoring purposes are helpful. Adequate education and understanding of use of the scales is critical for accurate assessment and subsequent interventions.</description><dc:title>Pain Assessment Tool in the Critically Ill Post–Open Heart Surgery Patient Population - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Liza Marmo, Susan Fowler</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.05.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001234/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Central Sensitivity Syndromes: Mounting Pathophysiologic Evidence to Link Fibromyalgia with Other Common Chronic Pain Disorders - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209001234/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The aim of this study was to review emerging data from the fields of nursing, rheumatology, dentistry, gastroenterology, gynecology, neurology, and orthopedics that support or dispute pathophysiologic similarities in pain syndromes studied by each specialty. A literature search was performed through PubMed and Ovid using the terms fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder/interstitial cystitis, headache, chronic low back pain, chronic neck pain, functional syndromes, and somatization. Each term was linked with pathophysiology and/or central sensitization. This paper presents a review of relevant articles with a specific goal of identifying pathophysiologic findings related to nociceptive processing. The extant literature presents considerable overlap in the pathophysiology of these diagnoses. Given the psychosomatic lens through which many of these disorders are viewed, demonstration of evidence-based links supporting shared pathophysiology between these disorders could provide direction to clinicians and researchers working to treat these diagnoses. “Central sensitivity syndromes” denotes an emerging nomenclature that could be embraced by researchers investigating each of these disorders. Moreover, a shared paradigm would be useful in promoting cross-fertilization between researchers. Scientists and clinicians could most effectively forward the understanding and treatment of fibromyalgia and other common chronic pain disorders through an appreciation of their shared pathophysiology.</description><dc:title>Central Sensitivity Syndromes: Mounting Pathophysiologic Evidence to Link Fibromyalgia with Other Common Chronic Pain Disorders - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Lindsay L. Kindler, Robert M. Bennett, Kim D. Jones</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.10.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000575/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Prior Conditions Influencing Nurses' Decisions to Adopt Evidence-Based Postoperative Pain Assessment Practices - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000575/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Over the past 30 years, postoperative pain relief has been shown to be inadequate. To provide optimal postoperative pain relief, it is imperative for nurses to use evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices. This correlational descriptive study was conducted to identify factors, termed prior conditions, that influenced nurses' decisions to adopt three evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices. A convenience sample of nurses who cared for adult postoperative patients in two Midwestern hospitals were surveyed, and 443 (46.9%) nurses responded. The previous practice and innovativeness of nurses were supportive of adoption of the three practices. Nurses felt that patients received adequate pain relief, which is unsupportive of adoption of the three practices because there is no impetus to change. Nurses who perceived the prior conditions as being supportive of adoption of pain management practices used multiple sources to identify solutions to clinical practice problems, and those who read professional nursing journals were more likely to have adopted the three practices and were more innovative. The number of sources used to identify solutions to clinical practice problems, previous practices, and innovativeness were predictive of nurses' adoption of the three evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices. Nurses need to be encouraged to use multiple sources, including professional nursing journals, to identify solutions to clinical practice problems. Innovative nurses may be considered to be opinion leaders and need to be identified to promote the adoption of evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices. Further exploration of the large unexplained variance in adoption of evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices is needed.</description><dc:title>Prior Conditions Influencing Nurses' Decisions to Adopt Evidence-Based Postoperative Pain Assessment Practices - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Cathy L. Carlson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.05.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900054X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Barriers to Pain Management among Adolescents with Cancer - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS152490420900054X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Patient-related barriers to reporting pain and using analgesics (e.g., fear of addiction) can detrimentally affect pain management for adolescents with cancer. However, adolescent barriers have not been systematically investigated; furthermore, no instrument exists to measure these barriers. The purposes of this study were to examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed Adolescent Barriers Questionnaire (ABQ) and to describe adolescent barriers to pain management. The study was guided by a barriers model which suggests that barriers (beliefs) influence coping (hesitation to report pain, use of analgesics, and adequacy of analgesics), which in turn affects outcomes (pain severity and quality of life). Sixty adolescent patients with cancer aged 12-17 years completed the ABQ; 22 of which reported pain and also completed measures of hesitation, analgesic use, pain severity, and physical and psychosocial function. Initial testing provided evidence that the ABQ is reliable and valid. Internal consistency estimates for the total scale ranged from 0.91 to 0.94 and for the subscales ranged from 0.54 to 0.96. Test-retest reliability over a 2-week period was r=0.82. Construct validity was supported by a significant positive relationship between barriers scores and coping (hesitation to report pain and to use analgesics). However, coping did not mediate the relationship between barriers and outcomes. All of the adolescents reported some barriers. Barriers scores did not vary by age or gender. The leading barrier was concern that social activities would be restricted if pain was reported. Clearly, adolescents have barriers that can interfere with pain management. Interventions are needed to identify and help adolescents overcome these barriers.</description><dc:title>Barriers to Pain Management among Adolescents with Cancer - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Suzanne Ameringer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.05.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-14</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-14</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000666/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Piloting Tailored Teaching on Nonpharmacologic Enhancements for Postoperative Pain Management in Older Adults - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000666/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Despite many advances in the pharmacologic treatment of pain, the issue of unresolved postoperative pain continues to plague patients and health care professionals. Little seems to be known about the reasons why nonpharmacologic methods are not more widely used, particularly as they are commonly low in cost, easy to use, and largely free of adverse side effects. A central question has to do with what patients are taught about nonpharmacologic methods and how a novel mode of teaching can be embedded in practice. A seven-step pre-posttest teaching intervention pilot study was deployed with older joint replacement patients within the context of a translational research model. Results of the teaching pilot showed significant post-teaching changes in subjects' knowledge and attitudes about nonpharmacologic methods for pain management, high satisfaction with the nonpharmacologic methods they chose, and incrementally greater use of the nonpharmacologic methods over the course of the hospital stay. A randomized controlled trial of the study is now in the early planning stages in an effort to obtain generalizable results that will help solidify evidence of the impact of music, imagery, and slow-stroke massage on pain management and confirm the value of patient teaching as an important means of offering patients more options for managing their own pain.</description><dc:title>Piloting Tailored Teaching on Nonpharmacologic Enhancements for Postoperative Pain Management in Older Adults - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Susanne M. Tracy</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-14</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-14</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000551/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Relaxation and Imagery for Chronic, Nonmalignant Pain: Effects on Pain Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Mental Health - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000551/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Nonpharmacologic treatments are being increasingly adopted as alternative or primary approaches to chronic pain management. We present results of a pilot study examining the effect of a 6-week combined abbreviated progressive relaxation technique (APRT) and guided imagery (GI) intervention for the management of chronic pain (N=19) and, using power analysis, explore recommended sample sizes for future clinical trials. Results indicated consistent and clinically significant trends of improvement on pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale), mental health (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale), all domains of quality of life (RAND-36 Health Survey), and sleep for the treatment group only. Owing to inadequate power in this study, these results were not statistically significant. Methodologic concerns, along with suggestions for an improved intervention protocol, are discussed. It is concluded that there is strong preliminary evidence for the efficacy of APRT and GI as an adjunct to conventional treatment options for chronic pain.</description><dc:title>Relaxation and Imagery for Chronic, Nonmalignant Pain: Effects on Pain Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Mental Health - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Yi Ling (Elaine) Chen, Andrew J.P. Francis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.05.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-09</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000563/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of Music on Pain for Home-Dwelling Persons with Dementia - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000563/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of music on pain for home-dwelling persons with dementia. A quasiexperimental design was used. Fifteen subjects listened to their preferred music for 30minutes before peak agitation time, for 2 days per week, followed by no music for 2 weeks. The process was repeated once. The finding of this study showed that mean pain levels after listening to music were significantly lower than before listening to the music (t=2.21, df=28; p &lt; .05). The findings of this pilot study suggest the importance of music intervention to control pain for home-dwelling persons with dementia.</description><dc:title>Effect of Music on Pain for Home-Dwelling Persons with Dementia - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Heeok Park</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.05.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000678/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Best Evidence of Psychosocially Focused Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Symptom Management in Older Adults with Osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.painmanagementnursing.org/article/PIIS1524904209000678/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint problem among older adults which causes severe pain and loss of physical function. Early diagnosis and proper management are important strategies in delaying disease exacerbation and maintaining physical mobility. The number of older adults suffering from joint diseases is increasing, and many of these individuals are using nonpharmacologic therapies (NPTs) to control pain. Because there is no cure for OA, interventions have aimed at controlling pain, improving joint function, and minimizing disability. This paper reviewed literature that examines the effects of psychosocially focused NPTs, including education, self-management, coping skills, and social support for pain control and function improvement in older adults with OA. This review demonstrates that NPTs do not have the side effects that pharmacologic therapies do, but more high-quality clinical trials with appropriate design and meta-analyses need to be conducted to more clearly identify the effects of such NPTs to control pain and improve physical function in older adults with OA. Because many NPTs are easy to learn and use without serious side effects, nurses can play a pivotal role in helping patients implement NPTs for maximal benefit.</description><dc:title>Best Evidence of Psychosocially Focused Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Symptom Management in Older Adults with Osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>So Young Shin, Ann M. Kolanowski</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.pmn.2009.06.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Pain Management Nursing (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Pain Management Nursing</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>