« BackPain Management Nursing
Article in Press

Is Pain Assessment Feasible as a Performance Indicator for Dutch Nursing Homes? A Cross-Sectional Approach

Presented as a poster at the European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters congress in Lisbon, Portugal, September 11, 2009.

  • Anneke A. Boerlage, MSc-N, RN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Anneke Boerlage, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Anniek D. Masman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital
  • ,
  • Jacobus Hagoort, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital
  • ,
  • Dick Tibboel, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital
  • ,
  • Frans P.M. Baar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antonius IJsselmonde, Laurens, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Monique van Dijk, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital

Received 14 October 2009; received in revised form 28 April 2010; accepted 4 May 2010. published online 26 July 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Quality of care gains transparency with the help of performance indicators. For Dutch nursing homes, the current set of performance indicators does not include pain. To determine the feasibility of pain assessment as performance indicator, information about pain prevalence and analgesic prescription in one nursing home was collected. Within the time span of 3 days, pain intensity was measured in 91% of the residents (201 out of 221), either with a numeric rating scale, a verbal rating scale, or the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale (REPOS). Numerical rating was used for 72%, verbal rating for 3%, and REPOS observation for 25% of the residents. Pain was substantial in 65 residents (32%), who received the following analgesic prescription: World Health Organization (WHO) step 1, 45%; WHO step 3, 12%; and neuroactive agents, 5%. Thirty-eight percent of these residents were in pain and received no analgesics. Residents with substantial pain significantly more often received analgesics (p = .007). Results suggest that pain assessment is feasible in a nursing home and would stimulate staff attention to pain. Further investigation is necessary to find out if a pain algorithm is feasible and will lead to improved pain treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Send an E-mail with your postal address to a.boerlage@erasmusmc.nl to receive a free instructional CD-ROM about the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale.

PII: S1524-9042(10)00075-5

doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2010.05.003

« BackPain Management Nursing