Pain Management Nursing
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 58-64, June 2009

Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Pain Management Practices in Rural Nursing Homes Compared with Evidence-Based Criteria

  • Sheila A. Decker, PhD, APRN-BC

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sheila A. Decker, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, 6901 Bertner, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • Kennith R. Culp, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • Pamela Z. Cacchione, PhD, RN, BCGNP

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Barnes-Jewish Extended Care, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri

Received 12 October 2007; received in revised form 13 February 2008; accepted 25 February 2008. published online 11 November 2008.

Abstract 

Chronic pain, mainly associated with musculoskeletal diagnoses, is inadequately and often inappropriately treated in nursing home residents. The purpose of this descriptive study is to identify the musculoskeletal diagnoses associated with pain and to compare pain management of a sample of nursing home residents with the 1998 evidence-based guideline proposed by the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). The sample consists of 215 residents from 13 rural Iowa nursing home homes. The residents answered a series of face-to-face questions that addressed the presence/absence of pain and completed the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Data on pain were abstracted from the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Analyses included descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and one-way analysis of variance. Residents' responses to the face-to-face pain questions yielded higher rates of pain compared with the MDS pain data. Resident records showed that acetaminophen was the most frequently administered analgesic medication (30.9%). Propoxyphene, not an AGS-recommended opioid, was also prescribed for 23 residents (10.7%). Of the 70 residents (32.6%) expressing daily pain, 23 (32.9%) received no scheduled or pro re nata analgesics. There was no significant difference between MMSE scores and number of scheduled analgesics. Additionally, residents' self-reported use of topical agents was not documented in the charts. The findings suggest that the 1998 AGS evidence-based guideline for the management of chronic pain is inconsistently implemented.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by the National Institute on Aging: 1 R01 AG17939-01; K. Culp (PI).

PII: S1524-9042(08)00069-6

doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2008.02.008

Pain Management Nursing
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 58-64, June 2009